Jump to content

User:Jcmcc450: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{userboxtop}}
{{userboxtop}}
{{User:UBX/US military veteran}}
{{user USAFe2}}
{{User wikipedia/WikiJanitor}}
{{User:Koman90/userbox files/comptia|Security Plus}}
{{User:Koman90/userbox files/comptia|Security Plus}}
{{user wikipedia/RC Patrol}}
{{user wikipedia/RC Patrol}}
{{Template:User CCNA}}
{{Template:User c++-2}}
{{Template:User c++-2}}
{{Template:User java-1}}
{{Template:User java-1}}
Line 10: Line 12:
{{User:Saerain/Userboxes/Accurate words}}
{{User:Saerain/Userboxes/Accurate words}}
{{User:Liam Skoda/Userboxes/GMO}}
{{User:Liam Skoda/Userboxes/GMO}}
{{userboxbottom}}
I discovered Wikipedia back in 2007, but didn't begin actively editing until years later. I tend to edit as impartially as possible. When I start to feel emotions creeping up on an article, I usually unwatch it and move on. I primarily remove content from Wikipedia and add tags requesting someone swing by to add reliably sourced information. I do this not out of laziness, but out of my schedule. I work for the US Air Force and edit Wikipedia when I am not actively working. I usually have 5 - 10 minute windows leaving me just enough time to find a page and delete obviously bad content. Just writing this biography has taken me 5 - 6 breaks.

== On Wikilove ==

Many users have expressed their dislike of my dislike of Wikilove. I have been here long enough to have a very broad understanding of Wikilove and its purpose. That said, I believe that Wikilove is used far too often to curry favor and impartiality on Wikipedia. I often see users handing out barnstars, or plates of cookies or what-have-you for editing things in ways that indirectly take their "side" in a wiki-argument. I strongly believe that impartiality is a critical component to the project and that any editor with a strong opinion on a subject has no business '''removing''' content from the related article. (However, I think strong opinions really help '''additions''' to articles. Some of the best articles on Wikipedia are largely in part to very passionate editors.) I digress. My feeling on Wikilove is that if I partake in it, I will inevitably be persuaded by it thereby compromising my ability to impartially edit.

== On Myself ==

I am a [[human]]. I have [[red hair]]. I am genetically from [[Scotland]]. I was born and raised in [[California]]. I was born on {{bda|1992|04|23}}. I am a [[male]]. I love playing video games. Especially with my wife. My favorite food is egg-salad sandwiches. I like them so much that I will eat them until I am very bloated and sick feeling.

== On My Goals ==

I edit Wikipedia for fun and for edification. I primarily strive to remove all content that does not belong whether that be articles, edits, sections, or users that shouldn't be part of the project. I often find myself in conflict with Wikipedia editors due to removing their content or stubbing it with a request for sources. Though I have been often accused of having an agenda, it's usually a case of [[Psychological projection|projection]]. I take care not to edit pages that I have an opinion on.

Latest revision as of 03:41, 25 June 2021

I discovered Wikipedia back in 2007, but didn't begin actively editing until years later. I tend to edit as impartially as possible. When I start to feel emotions creeping up on an article, I usually unwatch it and move on. I primarily remove content from Wikipedia and add tags requesting someone swing by to add reliably sourced information. I do this not out of laziness, but out of my schedule. I work for the US Air Force and edit Wikipedia when I am not actively working. I usually have 5 - 10 minute windows leaving me just enough time to find a page and delete obviously bad content. Just writing this biography has taken me 5 - 6 breaks.

On Wikilove

[edit]

Many users have expressed their dislike of my dislike of Wikilove. I have been here long enough to have a very broad understanding of Wikilove and its purpose. That said, I believe that Wikilove is used far too often to curry favor and impartiality on Wikipedia. I often see users handing out barnstars, or plates of cookies or what-have-you for editing things in ways that indirectly take their "side" in a wiki-argument. I strongly believe that impartiality is a critical component to the project and that any editor with a strong opinion on a subject has no business removing content from the related article. (However, I think strong opinions really help additions to articles. Some of the best articles on Wikipedia are largely in part to very passionate editors.) I digress. My feeling on Wikilove is that if I partake in it, I will inevitably be persuaded by it thereby compromising my ability to impartially edit.

On Myself

[edit]

I am a human. I have red hair. I am genetically from Scotland. I was born and raised in California. I was born on (1992-04-23) April 23, 1992 (age 32). I am a male. I love playing video games. Especially with my wife. My favorite food is egg-salad sandwiches. I like them so much that I will eat them until I am very bloated and sick feeling.

On My Goals

[edit]

I edit Wikipedia for fun and for edification. I primarily strive to remove all content that does not belong whether that be articles, edits, sections, or users that shouldn't be part of the project. I often find myself in conflict with Wikipedia editors due to removing their content or stubbing it with a request for sources. Though I have been often accused of having an agenda, it's usually a case of projection. I take care not to edit pages that I have an opinion on.