User talk:RichardMalter: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Reply'''Taking out non-neutral information is entirely consistant. Adding or correcting information is the same. Do you know of the phrase 'the pot calling the kettle black'? This is what is happening with this discussion. |
'''Reply'''Taking out non-neutral information is entirely consistant. Adding or correcting information is the same. Do you know of the phrase 'the pot calling the kettle black'? This is what is happening with this discussion. |
||
== [[WP:3RR]] == |
|||
Please note that wikipedia policy ([[WP:3RR]]) prohibits the reversion of an edit more than three times in 24 hours. I should have warned you of this earlier, but as you told me to read Wikipedia's rules, I thought that you had done so yourself. You can probably avoid punishment be self-reverting your edits, as per [[WP:3RR]]. Sorry --[[User:Philosophus|'''Philosophus''']] <sup>[[User talk:Philosophus|'''T''']]</sup> 08:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
see Vandalism. Please also stop reverting my edits. It is a two sided, not, one sides process.--[[User:RichardMalter|RichardMalter]] 08:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==3RR warning== |
|||
Hi Richard, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at [[Bi-Digital O-Ring Test]]. Because you're new, I'm leaving this warning rather than blocking you, but please note that if you violate it again, you're likely to be blocked without warning. Please read the policy carefully at [[WP:3RR]]. Also, please don't accuse other editors of vandalism. Cheers, [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] [[User_talk:SlimVirgin|<sup style="color:purple;">(talk)</sup>]] 09:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
OK. Why dont you help stopping a group of people that have a declared bias from deleting simple facts, and trying to manipulate this page to express their bias? If you actually read through what is happening - you will see what I mean.--[[User:RichardMalter|RichardMalter]] 13:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:3RR does not depend on content. Because you ignored the warning and reverted again, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bi-Digital_O-Ring_Test&diff=prev&oldid=53859519] you've been blocked for 24 hours. Please use the time to review our editing policies. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] [[User_talk:SlimVirgin|<sup style="color:purple;">(talk)</sup>]] 16:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 18 July 2021
Bi-Digital O-Ring Test
[edit]Please stop blanking this article. This is not considered an appropriate thing to do in Wikipedia. --Philosophus T 03:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
ReplyTaking out non-neutral information is entirely consistant. Adding or correcting information is the same. Do you know of the phrase 'the pot calling the kettle black'? This is what is happening with this discussion.
Please note that wikipedia policy (WP:3RR) prohibits the reversion of an edit more than three times in 24 hours. I should have warned you of this earlier, but as you told me to read Wikipedia's rules, I thought that you had done so yourself. You can probably avoid punishment be self-reverting your edits, as per WP:3RR. Sorry --Philosophus T 08:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
see Vandalism. Please also stop reverting my edits. It is a two sided, not, one sides process.--RichardMalter 08:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
3RR warning
[edit]Hi Richard, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Bi-Digital O-Ring Test. Because you're new, I'm leaving this warning rather than blocking you, but please note that if you violate it again, you're likely to be blocked without warning. Please read the policy carefully at WP:3RR. Also, please don't accuse other editors of vandalism. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 09:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
OK. Why dont you help stopping a group of people that have a declared bias from deleting simple facts, and trying to manipulate this page to express their bias? If you actually read through what is happening - you will see what I mean.--RichardMalter 13:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- 3RR does not depend on content. Because you ignored the warning and reverted again, [1] you've been blocked for 24 hours. Please use the time to review our editing policies. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)