User talk:Fatma Ataallah: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
10mmsocket (talk | contribs) →September 2021: Reply |
Not continuing to help Wikipedia due to harassment by other users |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{RETIRED}} |
||
== September 2021 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]" and is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]]. |
|||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|lose their editing privileges]] on that page. This isn't done to [[WP:BLOCKP|punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring]]. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Ifnord|Ifnord]] ([[User talk:Ifnord|talk]]) 14:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:For the benefit of @Ifnord, the site given as a reference is http://todor66.com/ It is very clearly a self-published source and alarm bells wring when one notes that it isn't even operating over a secure https: link, only plain unencrypted http. It's very amateurish. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 15:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
My work was absolutely right. Another user harassed me without checking the sources |
|||
The only one that you gave (sporadically) was a fansite. As I have explained in response to your comments on my talk page, you cannot add unreferenced information, nor can you add information with poor references. Self-published websites, as in the case of the website that you provided are not considered to be reliable sources. See [[WP:SPS]]. --[[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 15:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
T |
|||
his site is the largest site for team sports results. I saw that it was also used in dozens of Wikipedia articles. |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Asian_Men%27s_Volleyball_Championship |
|||
See the source of this article. This is the only site in the whole web that has old and valid results of team disciplines. How do you claim it is not valid? There is no other resource in the entire web space. |
|||
In basketball and football, the results have been accurately recorded by the relevant authorities. But this is not the case due to the weak structure of handball or volleyball. The source site updates the old results almost monthly by getting old archives. So we do not have another site at the moment. All the first ten rounds of Asian handball are referenced to this site |
|||
see: |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_Asian_Women%27s_Handball_Championship#External_links |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:57, 18 September 2021
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.