User talk:104.162.193.17: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m →As an IP, you are not allowed to make edits related to the topics described in the alert below: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD |
||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in |
||
== May 2017 == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Kingdom of Israel (united monarchy)]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. ''You are changing quotations to meet a pov''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 17:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | :''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
||
== As an IP, you are not allowed to make edits related to the topics described in the alert below == |
|||
== Discretionary sanctions notice == |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|here]]. |
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|here]]. |
||
| ⚫ | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
::How does the Kingdom of Israel have anything to do with the arab-Israeli conflict when arabs did not even exist when this kingdom did? |
|||
== December 2018 == |
|||
| ⚫ | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[ |
||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|poorly referenced]] information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living (or recently deceased) persons]], as you did to [[:Jimmy Iovine]]. ''Growing up in a Jewish neighborhood does not equate to being Jewish.''<!-- Template:uw-biog2 --> —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 12:53, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
== |
== May 2019 == |
||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Jewish revolt against Heraclius]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
| ⚫ | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --><b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Wikaviani|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Wikaviani|<span style="color:purple">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 20:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
Hi. I see that you are participating in articles that concern the Israel-Palestine conflict. There was a rule passed in November of last year that says that everyone who edits that subject must have at least thirty days' experience and at least five hundred edits: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#500.2F30 Here] I don't know if this means you must withdraw your AE filing against Opdire; my guess is that it does not. Generally, one violation does not cancel out someone else's However, if this was a good-faith mistake, you should establish a non-anonymous account and take at least a month to build your reputation on Wikipedia through productive edits. This isn't a formality. It helps new users learn the ropes and rules in places where the consequences for accidentally breaking them aren't as dire. Good luck. [[User:Darkfrog24|Darkfrog24]] ([[User talk:Darkfrog24|talk]]) 17:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Hello 104.162.193.17. As an IP editor you are banned from editing ARBPIA articles such as [[Eilabun massacre]] and [[Arab Higher Committee]]. Please cease. You are risking a block. Come back with a registered account after satisfying the 500/30 rule. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 year''' for [[WP:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|block evasion]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 21:36, 23 May 2019 (UTC)</div></div> |
|||
== Blocked for continuing to edit ARBPIA material with an IP == |
|||
: ''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]''.<!-- Template:uw-ablock --> |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] (specifically [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|this section]]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me ([[Special:EmailUser/EdJohnston|by email]]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. <hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Standard provision: appeals and modifications|procedure instructing administrators]] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> Per [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Category:Black_September_Organization&diff=prev&oldid=706511549 this edit of a category related to the Arab-Israeli conflict] you are blocked three days. I had previously given you a warning with [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:104.162.193.17&diff=706499002&oldid=706318328 this message]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Template:uw-ipevadeblock --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:21, 5 October 2021
May 2017
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kingdom of Israel (united monarchy), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are changing quotations to meet a pov Doug Weller talk 17:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
As an IP, you are not allowed to make edits related to the topics described in the alert below
[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Doug Weller talk 18:19, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- How does the Kingdom of Israel have anything to do with the arab-Israeli conflict when arabs did not even exist when this kingdom did?
December 2018
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jimmy Iovine. Growing up in a Jewish neighborhood does not equate to being Jewish. —C.Fred (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
May 2019
[edit]Your recent editing history at Jewish revolt against Heraclius shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 20:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:36, 23 May 2019 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.