User:Beelzebarn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 00:26, 4 February 2007

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Marsden (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to Checkuser for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{SockpuppetCheckuser|Marsden}}
-[[User:William M. Connolley]] complaint
-On January 29, User:William M. Connolley entered a "revert war" at [[Middle East Media Research Institute]], protecting the article five minutes after [[User:Isarig]] had reverted the article. Prior to Isarig's revert, the article had been quiet for 3 hours 22 minutes. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Middle_East_Media_Research_Institute&action=history]
-I found the timing of the revert-then-protect suspicious, and I asked Connolley to explain how it occurred. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWilliam_M._Connolley&diff=104184995&oldid=104184078]
-Rather than explaining his actions, Connolley responded, "If I hadn't protected it you'd now find yourself with a 24h block, so be grateful." [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_M._Connolley&diff=next&oldid=104184995]
-(The block threat may have been made in relation to a mistaken accusation by Isarig that I had violated the "3RR" rule: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Beelzebarn_reported_by_Isarig_15:49.2C_29_January_2007_.28UTC.29.28Result:_protected.29])
-Following this uncivil and threatening reply, I informed Connolley that I would be looking into how I could report him for abuse, and after being told of the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] route, I informed him that I would begin preparing a complaint against him, but that I'd prefer that he just answer my original question.
-Prior Protections by Connolley:
-January 25: Protected [Baibars] article 9 minutes after revert by [[user:Khoikhoi]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Baibars&diff=prev&oldid=103205965]
-January 15: Protected [Toad (Nintendo)] immediately after reverting it himself (this seems to have been done in response to a nonsensical editor)
-January 4: Protected [Execution of Saddam Hussein] article 3 minutes after revert by [[user:UBeR]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein&diff=98516893&oldid=98516282]
-(Connolley apparently made some edits to the article while it was "protected" [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein&diff=next&oldid=98516893] and was told by [[user:Halo]] that "using page protection to keep the page supporting your opinion on a matter is /extremely bad form/."[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_M._Connolley&diff=prev&oldid=98602235]
-December 18: Asked to protect [[Afghanistan]] article on talk page, but declined. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_M._Connolley&diff=prev&oldid=95072746]
-December 13: Protected [Sveasoft] almost an hour after revert by [[user:24.218.180.170]]