Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mageborn: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Eddie891|Eddie891]] <small>''<sup> [[User talk:Eddie891|Talk]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Eddie891|Work]]</sub>'' </small> 14:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|1=Mageborn}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mageborn|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 9#{{anchorencode:Mageborn}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|1=Mageborn}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mageborn|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 9#{{anchorencode:Mageborn}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
* '''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NBOOK]] lacks third party independent sources.[[User:Pharaoh of the Wizards|Pharaoh of the Wizards]] ([[User talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards|talk]]) 20:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NBOOK]] lacks third party independent sources.[[User:Pharaoh of the Wizards|Pharaoh of the Wizards]] ([[User talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards|talk]]) 20:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Non-notable series, possibly promotional creation by SPA. [[User:Avilich|Avilich]] ([[User talk:Avilich|talk]]) 20:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Non-notable series, possibly promotional creation by SPA. [[User:Avilich|Avilich]] ([[User talk:Avilich|talk]]) 20:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 16 November 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mageborn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a fantasy novel series, not properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for books. The notability claim here is that the series exists, there's no indication whatsoever of the kind of distinctions (noteworthy literary awards, significant critical attention, etc.) that it takes to bridge the existence vs. notability gap, the article is referenced entirely to the author's own self-published website and GoodReads profile rather than any evidence whatsoever of notability-building coverage in real reliable sources, and the cherry on top is that even the author doesn't have a standalone Wikipedia article at all. (And while that isn't an instant speedy deletion criterion for books the way it is for musical albums, it is still a useful gauge of the article's prospects for salvageability.) Bearcat (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as it fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. A quick research has shown no results from reliable independent sources. Isabelle 🔔 15:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. My BEFORE found no evidence the book series is notable, and the author doesn't have have an article, so there's even no SOFTDELETE redirect target. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK lacks third party independent sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable series, possibly promotional creation by SPA. Avilich (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.