Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right Livelihood Award: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:22, 30 November 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right Livelihood Award

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization's notability seems to rest on some very brief mentions in a few news sources (e.g. BBC, Deutche World). I note that none of these articles have bylines, and they all seem to read like press-releases. There's no evidence that anybody other than the organisation themselves considers the Right Livelihood award to be an "Alternative Nobel Prize". The vast majority of sources on this article are inappropriate (e.g. YT, primary sources) which do little to establish any notability for this subject. Salimfadhley (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reliable mainstream sources like SVT (the Swedish national televisin broadcasting corporation) also refers to it as the "alternative Nobel Prize". As does national radio. The award ceremony had been in the parliament for thirty years, and it is known well enough that it was news when it had to move, and big, national organisations were involved in the debate. SVT and SR, linked above, are perhaps the two most important and respected news organisations in Sweden, and go beyond just press releases. A search in w:sv:Mediearkivet gives plenty of results from all sorts of major Swedish newspapers, over a longer period of time. I'm sure there's a lot that could be done with the article, but the award itself is easily notable. /Julle (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. BBC and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung are pretty good sources. And what is YT? Rathfelder (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(YT is short for YouTube.) Remagoxer ^(talk) 14:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Notable as per above. SL93 (talk) 17:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - good sourcing. Award is per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 08:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Right Livelihood Award]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep'''. [[User:Eddie891|Eddie891]] <small>''<sup> [[User talk:Eddie891|Talk]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Eddie891|Work]]</sub>'' </small> 14:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
+===[[:Right Livelihood Award]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|1=Right Livelihood Award}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right Livelihood Award|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 23#{{anchorencode:Right Livelihood Award}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1056761681/cur|edits since nomination]])
@@ Line 12: / Line 17: @@
 * '''Keep'''.  BBC and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung are pretty good sources.  And what is YT?  [[User:Rathfelder|Rathfelder]] ([[User talk:Rathfelder|talk]]) 23:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 :* <span style="font-size:85%;">(YT is short for [[YouTube]].)</span> [[User:Remagoxer|<span style="color: #0a826b;">'''Rema'''</span><span style="color: #c91f0c;">'''goxer'''</span>]] [[User talk:Remagoxer|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''': Notable as per above. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 17:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' - good sourcing. Award is per WP:GNG.[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 08:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>