Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Reinhart: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:39, 13 December 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Reinhart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:FRINGEBLP of a non-notable subject. I can find no reviews of her books in reliable sources for WP:NAUTHOR. I don't think winning the Charles Harvey Award for Exceptional Service to Astrology ([1]) counts for WP:ANYBIO. The best source I could find is [2], but it's a book by astrologers published by an occult publisher. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep, has an authority control template~~ (I actually once saw this as a keep argument) In all seriousness, Delete, just not seeing any reliable non-in universe coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems to be relatively influential within the world of astrology; the subject matter being fringe doesn't make in-universe influence non-notable. Rusalkii (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rusalkii: Influential how? Where? Are you finding some sources that I don't see? -- Bob drobbs (talk) 04:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bob drobbs: "Influential" was maybe putting it too strongly. There's no individual source that makes her clearly notable, but she's cited in other books on astrology, features in videos and podcasts, etc. On further research the sources I found don't seem to indicate further depth of sources the way I expected, so still inclined towards keep but much weaker than my initial statement implied. Rusalkii (talk) 05:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I also could find nothing at all. Seems to fail WP:GNG. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 04:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete paucity of sources found, nothing to establish notability. -Roxy the dog. wooF 10:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources do not establish her notability. Inf-in MD (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Melanie Reinhart]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 03:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
+===[[:Melanie Reinhart]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|1=Melanie Reinhart}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Reinhart|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 13#{{anchorencode:Melanie Reinhart}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 10: / Line 15: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Paranormal|list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]] ([[User talk:AleatoryPonderings|???]]) ([[Special:Contributions/AleatoryPonderings|!!!]]) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]] ([[User talk:AleatoryPonderings|???]]) ([[Special:Contributions/AleatoryPonderings|!!!]]) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
+*{{strikethrough|Keep, has an authority control template}} (I actually once saw this as a keep argument) In all seriousness, '''Delete''', just not seeing any reliable non-in universe coverage. [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''', seems to be relatively influential within the world of astrology; the subject matter being fringe doesn't make in-universe influence non-notable. [[User:Rusalkii|Rusalkii]] ([[User talk:Rusalkii|talk]]) 02:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+*: {{reply to| Rusalkii}} Influential how?  Where?  Are you finding some sources that I don't see? -- [[User:Bob drobbs|Bob drobbs]] ([[User talk:Bob drobbs|talk]]) 04:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+*:: {{reply to|Bob drobbs}} "Influential" was maybe putting it too strongly. There's no individual source that makes her clearly notable, but she's cited in other books on astrology, features in videos and podcasts, etc. On further research the sources I found don't seem to indicate further depth of sources the way I expected, so still inclined towards keep but much weaker than my initial statement implied. [[User:Rusalkii|Rusalkii]] ([[User talk:Rusalkii|talk]]) 05:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': I also could find nothing at all.  Seems to fail [[WP:GNG]]. -- [[User:Bob drobbs|Bob drobbs]] ([[User talk:Bob drobbs|talk]]) 04:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' paucity of sources found, nothing to establish notability. -[[User:Roxy the dog|'''Roxy''' <small> the dog</small>.]] [[User talk:Roxy the dog|'''wooF''']] 10:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' sources do not establish her notability. [[User:Inf-in MD|Inf-in MD]] ([[User talk:Inf-in MD|talk]]) 16:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>