User talk:Thetruthisthere13: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How did I attack anyone? You and throast have basically exclusively pulled negative information from articles while removing anything positive and created a false narrative and false image of me. He positivily changed h3 and negativity other h3 “targets”. A review even if the sourcing makes this clear. This is not a threat I am taking appropriate actions to stop it but in the meantime I hoped senior editors would look at his and your history and see the obvious. If it’s not happening it just will take more time to expose him and you. I hope Ethan is paying you a lot of money as they sure praise both of you on their Reddit threads for helping fulfill their public call to “destroy my wiki” [[User:Thetruthisthere13|Thetruthisthere13]] ([[User talk:Thetruthisthere13#top|talk]]) 00:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC) |
How did I attack anyone? You and throast have basically exclusively pulled negative information from articles while removing anything positive and created a false narrative and false image of me. He positivily changed h3 and negativity other h3 “targets”. A review even if the sourcing makes this clear. This is not a threat I am taking appropriate actions to stop it but in the meantime I hoped senior editors would look at his and your history and see the obvious. If it’s not happening it just will take more time to expose him and you. I hope Ethan is paying you a lot of money as they sure praise both of you on their Reddit threads for helping fulfill their public call to “destroy my wiki” [[User:Thetruthisthere13|Thetruthisthere13]] ([[User talk:Thetruthisthere13#top|talk]]) 00:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Per [[WP:PA]], you should comment on <em>content</em>, not <em>contributors</em> if there's an issue. Regarding any comments on editors, the guideline says, "Serious accusations require serious evidence, usually in the form of diffs and links." |
|||
:Suggesting that I'm being paid to edit (when I haven't disclosed a conflict of interest according to [[WP:PE]]) is defamatory. I'm not being paid for any of my editing, and I would <em>never</em> accept payment without following Wikipedia's guidelines. I always edit in good faith, and I always follow guidelines to the very best of my knowledge and ability. I'm not aware of or participating in any Reddit forums about "your" wiki. [[User:Popoki35|Popoki35]] ([[User talk:Popoki35|talk]]) 13:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==Sockpuppet investigation== |
==Sockpuppet investigation== |
Latest revision as of 15:19, 18 January 2022
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Ryan Kavanaugh. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Popoki35 (talk) 11:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
How did I attack anyone? You and throast have basically exclusively pulled negative information from articles while removing anything positive and created a false narrative and false image of me. He positivily changed h3 and negativity other h3 “targets”. A review even if the sourcing makes this clear. This is not a threat I am taking appropriate actions to stop it but in the meantime I hoped senior editors would look at his and your history and see the obvious. If it’s not happening it just will take more time to expose him and you. I hope Ethan is paying you a lot of money as they sure praise both of you on their Reddit threads for helping fulfill their public call to “destroy my wiki” Thetruthisthere13 (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Per WP:PA, you should comment on content, not contributors if there's an issue. Regarding any comments on editors, the guideline says, "Serious accusations require serious evidence, usually in the form of diffs and links."
- Suggesting that I'm being paid to edit (when I haven't disclosed a conflict of interest according to WP:PE) is defamatory. I'm not being paid for any of my editing, and I would never accept payment without following Wikipedia's guidelines. I always edit in good faith, and I always follow guidelines to the very best of my knowledge and ability. I'm not aware of or participating in any Reddit forums about "your" wiki. Popoki35 (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RK777713, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Throast (talk | contribs) 15:04, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Mz7 (talk) 02:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)I don’t understand what this means? I have done nothing wrong? Thetruthisthere13 (talk) 00:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)