Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Söderströms Förlags Ab: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:16, 21 January 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Söderströms Förlags Ab

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no information, and no notability. Philosophy2 (talk) 15:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Söderströms was one of the two dominating Swedish-language publishing houses (together with Schildts) in Finland. (Finland is bilingual, Swedish being the smaller of the two official languages.) It had been central in Swedish literature since the 1800s; afte the merger with Schildts, Schildts & Söderström alone dominated the market. This is a key organisation in the history of (Swedish-language) Finnish culture. There's a lot that remains to do, but I've updated the article with sources. /Julle (talk) 18:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as Julle says this was a major and long-established publishing house in Scandinavia. Actually I'd have no objection to having one Schildts & Söderströms article (Swedish Wiki has one of those, Schildts & Söderströms), but we can decide that after this AfD has been closed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preferably, we'd have one for Söderströms, one for Schildts, and one for Schildts & Söderströms. But someone would have to write them, too. The eternal problem. /Julle (talk) 04:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: "no information"? What kind of nonsense is that? Geschichte (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a (if not the) key player in both Finnish and Swedish language publishing in Finland. Looking at this, I'd be inclined to even retarget WSOY (publisher) and Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö to this article rather than their current target, Bonnier Group, which barely mention them. -Ljleppan (talk) 08:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per keep arguments posted above are convincing. Chelokabob (talk) 04:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: as mentioned, this was a long-standing and key publisher of both Swedish-language and Finnish-language material. Definitely important to Swedish-speaking Finnish culture. flod logic (talk) 11:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Söderströms Förlags Ab]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep'''. [[User:Eddie891|Eddie891]] <small>''<sup> [[User talk:Eddie891|Talk]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Eddie891|Work]]</sub>'' </small> 18:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
+===[[:Söderströms Förlags Ab]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|1=Söderströms Förlags Ab}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Söderströms Förlags Ab|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 12#{{anchorencode:Söderströms Förlags Ab}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1020957202/cur|edits since nomination]])
@@ Line 9: / Line 14: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Finland|list of Finland-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 16:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)</small>
 * '''Strong keep'''. Söderströms was one of the two dominating Swedish-language publishing houses (together with Schildts) in Finland. (Finland is bilingual, Swedish being the smaller of the two official languages.) It had been central in Swedish literature since the 1800s; afte the merger with Schildts, Schildts & Söderström alone dominated the market. This is a ''key'' organisation in the history of (Swedish-language) Finnish culture. There's a lot that remains to do, but I've updated the article with sources. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 18:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
-* '''Keep''', as Julle says this was a major and long-established publishing house in Scandinavia. Actually I'd have no objection to having one [[Schildts & Söderströms]] article (Swedish Wiki has one of those, {{ill|Schildts & Söderströms|sv}}), but we can decide that after this AfD has been closed. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''', as Julle says this was a major and long-established publishing house in Scandinavia. Actually I'd have no objection to having one [[Schildts & Söderströms]] article (Swedish Wiki has one of those, [[Schildts & Söderströms]]), but we can decide that after this AfD has been closed. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 ::Preferably, we'd have one for Söderströms, one for Schildts, and one for Schildts & Söderströms. But someone would have to write them, too. The eternal problem. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 04:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''': "no information"? What kind of nonsense is that? [[User:Geschichte|Geschichte]] ([[User talk:Geschichte|talk]]) 22:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' as a (if not ''the'') key player in both Finnish and Swedish language publishing in Finland. Looking at this, I'd be inclined to even retarget [[WSOY (publisher)]] and [[Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö]] to this article rather than their current target, [[Bonnier Group]], which barely mention them. -[[User:Ljleppan|''Ljleppan'']] ([[User talk:Ljleppan|talk]]) 08:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' as per keep arguments posted above are convincing. [[User:Chelokabob|Chelokabob]] ([[User talk:Chelokabob|talk]]) 04:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Strong keep''': as mentioned, this was a long-standing and key publisher of both Swedish-language and Finnish-language material. Definitely important to Swedish-speaking Finnish culture. [[User:Flod logic|flod logic]] ([[User talk:Flod logic|talk]]) 11:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>