Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RevZilla: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:08, 31 January 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 07:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RevZilla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is not one single serious news or magazine article about RevZill. Besides press releases, the only coverage is pure fluff written by "media consultants". Being an Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year Award Finalist does not meet WP:COMPANY. The GPCC Emerging Business of the Year Award is a purely local award, open only to "emerging" (i.e. new and non-notable) businesses.

The upshot of these problems is that we have nothing of substance to create an article with. We need objective facts from independent sources, and without that we have nothing but unreliable, unverifiable company PR. Note that the article is all the work of COI single-purpose accounts, VifferSwiffer (talk · contribs) and Cgingrich (talk · contribs) Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom -- sourcing is too weak to satisfy WP:CORP guideline. — Brianhe (talk) 21:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] ([[User talk:Tawker|talk]]) 07:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 ===[[RevZilla]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|RevZilla}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RevZilla|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 26#{{anchorencode:RevZilla}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RevZilla Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 8: / Line 14: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' per nom -- sourcing is too weak to satisfy [[WP:CORP]] guideline. — [[User:Brianhe|Brianhe]] ([[User talk:Brianhe|talk]]) 21:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>