Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Nell: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:16, 2 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Take your drama elsewhere, please. Sandstein 19:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Nell

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[Jeremy Nell]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
-:{{la|Jeremy Nell}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Jeremy Nell|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Nell]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Nell|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 May 26#{{anchorencode:Jeremy Nell}}|View log]])</noinclude>
-Jeremy Nell is not noteworthy enough to have an article. Article was self-authored. [[User:Richard Catto|rrcatto]] ([[User talk:Richard Catto|talk]]) 21:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
+The result was  '''keep.'''  Take your drama elsewhere, please. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 19:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
+===[[Jeremy Nell]]===
+{{NOINDEX}}
-I am also nominating the following related pages because the page serves merely as an advertisement for Jeremy Nell's non-noteworthy blog and it is also another self authored article:
+{| class="messagebox"
-:{{la|Urban_Trash}}
+| This page has been [[Template:Courtesy blanked#Courtesy blanking|blanked as a courtesy]]. {{#ifeq:|yes|The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision is still in effect, and can be found in the [{{fullurl:Wikipedia:{{PAGENAME}}|action=history}} page history].}}
-[[User:Richard Catto|rrcatto]] ([[User talk:Richard Catto|talk]]) 21:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
+|}
-I am also nominating this related article because it is of low quality, self authored and describes a non-noteworthy cartoon.
-:{{la|Ditwits}} [[User:Richard Catto|rrcatto]] ([[User talk:Richard Catto|talk]]) 23:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''', notability demonstrated by sources. COI is not by itself a reason to delete; nor would be article quality, though this one looks fine (maybe a touch-up for PR tone). I personally would redirect [[Ditwits]] to Nell's own article, because in my (US) experience, editorial cartoons don't have separate notability or even generally titles, and in particular the article content is almost identical (across all three articles). I have no problem with a daily strip having separate notability, though. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
-I agree; this article has been around for long enough, and Nell is established enough as a recognised cartoonist, to warrant this article.  To delete this article simply because one comment (above) has suggested it, is not good enough. [[User:Crowlike|Crowlike]] ([[User talk:Crowlike|talk]]) 06:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)