Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fieldbrook Farms: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 11:29, 3 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 04:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fieldbrook Farms

Non-notable, no significant secondary source mentions. worthawholebean _talk^contribs 22:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a whole lot to go on here, does not make any attempt to demonstrate notability 24.44.98.90 (talk) 22:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Fieldbrook Farms is the largest private label ice cream manufacturer in the east, and is made up of companies which have been in existence for over 100 years. In that history of over a century the company has evolved in many ways reflected corporate America in general. It has an interesting and noteworthy history. It is a very notable company in the food industry and more than worthy of a Wikipedia article.68.109.18.69 (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Age does not contribute to notability in this case, and I can find nothing online about the company's early history, nor does the article provide any information about this evolution and why this company is notable. SandBoxer (talk) 01:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- These article discusses some of the events of the company's past. Definitely notable: http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/2000/06/05/story5.html, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3301/is_n8_v98/ai_19934646/, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=fieldbrook+farms (articles only relevant after 1996 because prior to that the company was known as Dunkirk Ice Cream). Try plugging Fieldbrook Farms, Dunkirk Ice Cream, any of its previous names or names of its subsidiaries into Google or Google News (archives) and you will find numerous articles highlighting its uniqueness, importance and notability.68.109.18.69 (talk) 04:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 68.109.18.69's sources, which are certainly non-trivial. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:CORP, I added the BusinessWeek profile to the reference section. It went bankrupt in 2001 and has had plenty of non-trivial coverage. It's a private-label frozen dairy product manufacturer which means if you eat a store brand in the Northeast U.S. they probably made it. Drawn Some (talk) 00:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[Fieldbrook Farms]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
-:{{la|Fieldbrook Farms}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Fieldbrook Farms|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fieldbrook Farms]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fieldbrook Farms|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 3#{{anchorencode:Fieldbrook Farms}}|View log]])</noinclude>
+The result was    '''keep'''. \ [[User:Backslash Forwardslash|Backslash Forwardslash]] / {[[User_Talk: Backslash Forwardslash|talk]]} 04:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
+===[[Fieldbrook Farms]]===
+:{{la|Fieldbrook Farms}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Fieldbrook Farms|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fieldbrook Farms]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fieldbrook Farms|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 11#{{anchorencode:Fieldbrook Farms}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 Non-notable, no significant secondary source mentions. [[User:Worthawholebean|worthawholebean]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User_talk:Worthawholebean|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Worthawholebean|contribs]]</span></sup> 22:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' not a whole lot to go on here, does not make any attempt to demonstrate notability [[Special:Contributions/24.44.98.90|24.44.98.90]] ([[User talk:24.44.98.90|talk]]) 22:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 01:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink|list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 01:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Strong keep''' Fieldbrook Farms is the largest private label ice cream manufacturer in the east, and is made up of companies which have been in existence for over 100 years. In that history of over a century the company has evolved in many ways reflected corporate America in general. It has an interesting and noteworthy history.  It is a very notable company in the food industry and more than worthy of a Wikipedia article.[[Special:Contributions/68.109.18.69|68.109.18.69]] ([[User talk:68.109.18.69|talk]]) 01:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Age does not contribute to notability in this case, and I can find nothing online about the company's early history, nor does the article provide any information about this evolution and why this company is notable. [[User:SandBoxer|SandBoxer]] ([[User talk:SandBoxer|talk]]) 01:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
+**These article discusses some of the events of the company's past. Definitely notable: http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/2000/06/05/story5.html, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3301/is_n8_v98/ai_19934646/, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=fieldbrook+farms (articles only relevant after 1996 because prior to that the company was known as Dunkirk Ice Cream). Try plugging Fieldbrook Farms, Dunkirk Ice Cream, any of its previous names or names of its subsidiaries into Google or Google News (archives) and you will find numerous articles highlighting its uniqueness, importance and notability.[[Special:Contributions/68.109.18.69|68.109.18.69]] ([[User talk:68.109.18.69|talk]]) 04:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
+<hr style="width:50%;" />
+:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
+*'''Keep''' per 68.109.18.69's sources, which are certainly non-trivial. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 00:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' Meets [[WP:CORP]], I added the BusinessWeek profile to the reference section.  It went bankrupt in 2001 and has had plenty of non-trivial coverage.  It's a private-label frozen dairy product manufacturer which means if you eat a store brand in the Northeast U.S. they probably made it. [[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 00:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>