Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfable (5th nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:10, 4 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as a reposted article (WP:CSD#G4) Tonywalton | Talk 11:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonfable

Apparently recreated after a previous deletion. Re-listed from here Djcartwright 06:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as repost. So tagged. MER-C 06:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a repost, and protect against recreation. Fabricationary 06:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good enough for an article. I don't agree with its previous deletion anyways. Canadianshoper 07:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Then take it to WP:DRV. "Good enough for an article" is not sufficient reason to overturn an AfD. Danny Lilithborne 11:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because this game really should be an article, once over 23k people played this. This should be an article.--Gravity^Talk 09:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Seriously, there shouldn't have even been a discussion. Danny Lilithborne 11:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (6th nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''Speedy delete''' as a reposted article ([[WP:CSD#G4]]) [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 11:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 ===[[Dragonfable]]===
+:{{la|Dragonfable}} <includeonly> — ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfable (5th nomination)|View AfD]])</includeonly>
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}}
-:{{la|Dragonfable}} <includeonly> — ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfable (Second nomination)|View AfD]])</includeonly>
+Apparently recreated after a previous deletion.  Re-listed from [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfable (2nd nomination)|here]] [[User:Djcartwright|Djcartwright]] 06:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
-Apparently recreated after a previous deletion.  Re-listed from [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfable|here]] [[User:Djcartwright|Djcartwright]] 06:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy delete''' as repost. So tagged. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 06:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy delete''' as a repost, and protect against recreation.  [[User:Fabricationary|Fabricationary]] 06:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' good enough for an article. I don't agree with its previous deletion anyways.  [[User:Canadianshoper|Canadianshoper]] 07:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
+**'''Comment''' Then take it to [[WP:DRV]].  "Good enough for an article" is not sufficient reason to overturn an AfD. [[User:Danny Lilithborne|Danny Lilithborne]] 11:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' because this game really should be an article, once over 23k people played this. This should be an article.--[[User:GravityFong|Gravity]]<small><sup>[[User Talk:GravityFong|Talk]]</sup></small> 09:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy Delete''' Seriously, there shouldn't have even been a discussion. [[User:Danny Lilithborne|Danny Lilithborne]] 11:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>