Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muni Jayanandvijay: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:21, 5 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muni Jayanandvijay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to address WP:BIO or WP:AUTHOR. Jayanandvijay is not credited on Satya Ki Khoj and I find no (non-circular) references on GBooks and no matches on GNews. Fæ (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 06:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Claimed notability is not verifiable. Nitalake (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Did you check Hephaestus Books review on him?[1] Or Books LLC's publication on him?[2] Wifione ^Message 10:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Books LLC make most of their books by copying articles out of Wikipedia categories, and this would seem to be no exception - everything listed in the title seems to have come straight out of Category:Jain monks by nationality. I haven't heard of Hephaestus Books before, but that one looks like it might be something similar. Alzarian16 (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wifione, please be aware of these sort of printed mirrors. See Hephasaestus Books and Books LLC. The fact that you are pointing to these as the best sources you can find is quite a good argument for deletion. --Fæ (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest Googling Hephaestus Books, and you'll find things like http://www.lawrenceperson.com/?p=6829 (and possibly worse...). Peridon (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Apart from a widely parroted piece about him opening something or other, there seems little or nothing like a reliable independent source in the first 10 Google search pages (with minuses removing Hephaestus and Wikipedia). The book quoted in the first reference has two hits on the Karlsruhe cataloguing, and the second one has very little for the publisher. Altogether, not a lot going for it. Peridon (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 19:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 ===[[Muni Jayanandvijay]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Muni Jayanandvijay}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muni Jayanandvijay|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 10#{{anchorencode:Muni Jayanandvijay}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 9: / Line 15: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red;">  Wifione</span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sup>Message</sup>''']] 06:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red;">  Wifione</span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sup>Message</sup>''']] 06:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *'''Delete''' Claimed notability is not verifiable. [[User:Nitalake|Nitalake]] ([[User talk:Nitalake|talk]]) 22:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 09:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 09:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *'''Comment''' Did you check Hephaestus Books review on him?[http://www.barnesandnoble.com/enwiki/w/indian-monks-including-hephaestus-books/1106595970?ean=9781244728288&itm=21&usri=muni] Or Books LLC's publication on him?[http://www.bookadda.com/product/jain-monks-nationality-books/p-9781157988908-1157988903] [[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red;">  Wifione</span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sup>Message</sup>''']] 10:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 **[[Books LLC]] make most of their books by copying articles out of Wikipedia categories, and this would seem to be no exception - everything listed in the title seems to have come straight out of [[:Category:Jain monks by nationality]]. I haven't heard of Hephaestus Books before, but that one looks like it might be something similar. [[User:Alzarian16|Alzarian16]] ([[User talk:Alzarian16|talk]]) 18:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
+**Wifione, please be aware of these sort of [[WP:CIRCULAR|printed mirrors]]. See [http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/5167894.Hephaestus_Books Hephasaestus Books] and [[Books LLC]]. The fact that you are pointing to these as the best sources you can find is quite a good argument for deletion. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 20:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
+:::I'd suggest Googling Hephaestus Books, and you'll find things like http://www.lawrenceperson.com/?p=6829 (and possibly worse...). [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 16:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' Apart from a widely parroted piece about him opening something or other, there seems little or nothing like a reliable independent source in the first 10 Google search pages (with minuses removing Hephaestus and Wikipedia). The book quoted in the first reference has two hits on the Karlsruhe cataloguing, and the second one has very little for the publisher. Altogether, not a lot going for it. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>