Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Blaze: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:02, 6 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 21:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brianna Blaze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Having had a quick look around I support the nom's argument that this does not pass WP:PORNBIO. Other than the base stats the article seems to comprise mostly of WP:OR -- Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly doesn't pass WP:Pornbio, and its difficult to imagine how this could otherwise achieve Notability. Of the three cites, two are to bulletin board posts. Merely having a listing at the IAFD does not confer Notability. And that's all she's got; no awards, no nominations for awards. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 14:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails notability per WP:PORNBIO. Esradekan (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:ENT criteria since she has been in over 30 productions. WP:PORNBIO are additional critera for inclusion, not exclusion rules. Chuthya (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment So, just out of curiosity, how many of these little throw-away, direct-to-video porn films must a person appear in, in order to satisfy WP:ENT, in your opinion? Because I'm rather getting the impression your answer is any integer > 0. Suffice it to say, there's no indication that appearing in "over 30" of these little films meets WP:ENT, as can be readily ascertained by clicking on that link. And for the record, by adult film industry standards, 30 films is a very brief & minor career. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 13:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply For purposes of WP:ENT:1 "multiple" would mean >1. Chuthya (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to be a relatively non-notable flash in the pan, minor starlet at best. ThuranX (talk) 16:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem to pass any notability criteria. The links in the references don't seem to be reliable sources. If it can be shown that they're reliable, my !vote should be discounted. -- Noroton (talk) 01:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|<span id="Brianna Blaze"></span>{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Blaze]]|padding=1px}}|}}
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:JForget|<span style="color:orange;">'''JForget''' </span>]] 21:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[Brianna Blaze]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Brianna Blaze}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Brianna Blaze|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Blaze]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Blaze|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 August 10#{{anchorencode:Brianna Blaze}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 7: / Line 14: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 12:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Delete''' - Having had a quick look around I support the nom's argument that this does not pass [[WP:PORNBIO]]. Other than the base stats the article seems to comprise mostly of [[WP:OR]] -- <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">[[User:Cabe6403|Cabe]]</font><font color="Green">[[User:Cabe6403/Gallery|6403]]</font> <sup>([[user_talk:Cabe6403|Talk]]•[[User:Cabe6403/Guest book|Sign]])</sup></font> 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' - Having had a quick look around I support the nom's argument that this does not pass [[WP:PORNBIO]]. Other than the base stats the article seems to comprise mostly of [[WP:OR]] -- <span style="font-family:Verdana;">[[User:Cabe6403|<span style="color:blue;">Cabe</span>]][[User:Cabe6403/Gallery|<span style="color:green;">6403</span>]] <sup>([[user_talk:Cabe6403|Talk]]•[[User:Cabe6403/Guest book|Sign]])</sup></span> 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Clearly doesn't pass [[WP:Pornbio]], and its difficult to imagine how this could otherwise achieve Notability.  Of the three cites, two are to bulletin board posts.  Merely having a listing at the [[IAFD]] does not confer Notability.  And that's all she's got; no awards, no nominations for awards. [[User:KevinOKeeffe|KevinOKeeffe]] ([[User talk:KevinOKeeffe|talk]]) 14:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]]. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 16:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)</span>
@@ Line 13: / Line 20: @@
 *'''Keep''' Meets [[WP:ENT]] criteria since she has been in over 30 productions. [[WP:PORNBIO]] are additional critera for inclusion, not exclusion rules. [[User:Chuthya|Chuthya]] ([[User talk:Chuthya|talk]]) 11:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 :*'''Comment'''  So, just out of curiosity, how many of these little throw-away, direct-to-video porn films must a person appear in, in order to satisfy [[WP:ENT]], in your opinion?  Because I'm rather getting the impression your answer is any integer > 0.  Suffice it to say, there's no indication that appearing in "over 30" of these little films meets [[WP:ENT]], as can be readily ascertained by clicking on that link.  And for the record, by adult film industry standards, 30 films is a very brief & minor career. [[User:KevinOKeeffe|KevinOKeeffe]] ([[User talk:KevinOKeeffe|talk]]) 13:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
-::*'''Reply''' For purposes of [[WP:ENT]]:1 "multiple" would mean >1. Don't like it? Get consensus to quantify the number and significance of the production. [[User:Chuthya|Chuthya]] ([[User talk:Chuthya|talk]]) 13:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
+::*'''Reply''' For purposes of [[WP:ENT]]:1 "multiple" would mean >1. [[User:Chuthya|Chuthya]] ([[User talk:Chuthya|talk]]) 13:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Seems to be a relatively non-notable flash in the pan, minor starlet at best. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] ([[User talk:ThuranX|talk]]) 16:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Doesn't seem to pass any notability criteria. The links in the references don't seem to be reliable sources. If it can be shown that they're reliable, my !vote should be discounted. -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 01:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}