Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompoCom: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:21, 6 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as pure advertisement. Non admin closure. Undead Warrior (talk) 03:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CompoCom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third party reliable sources found, so this company fails WP:CORP. An IP removed my Prod without addressing the problem. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (make that practically speedy) as blatant advertizing.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7. No indication of importance. I was unable to find any third-party coverage of the company. Jujutacular ^T · C 19:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular ^T · C 19:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular ^T · C 19:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as zero claim to notability. Also close to speedy on the blatant advertising front. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 20:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as pure blatant advertising. So tagged. Undead Warrior (talk) 03:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''speedy delete''' as pure advertisement. Non admin closure. [[User:Undead warrior|Undead Warrior]] ([[User talk:Undead warrior|talk]]) 03:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 ===[[CompoCom]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|CompoCom}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompoCom|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 June 16#{{anchorencode:CompoCom}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompoCom}}|2=AfD statistics}})
@@ Line 7: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Delete''' (make that practically '''speedy''') as blatant advertizing.--[[Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102]] ([[User talk:137.122.49.102|talk]]) 18:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy delete''' [[WP:CSD#A7]]. No indication of importance. I was unable to find any third-party coverage of the company. '''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Jujutacular|C]]</sup> 19:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—'''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Jujutacular|C]]</sup> 19:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—'''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Jujutacular|C]]</sup> 19:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Speedy Delete''' as zero claim to notability. Also close to speedy on the blatant advertising front. [[User:Chris Neville-Smith|Chris Neville-Smith]] ([[User talk:Chris Neville-Smith|talk]]) 20:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': I can't find significant coverage for this [[WP:CORP|company]]. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 20:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy Delete''' as pure blatant advertising. So tagged. [[User:Undead warrior|Undead Warrior]] ([[User talk:Undead warrior|talk]]) 03:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>