Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group FMG (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Philafrenzy (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 00:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Group FMG]]=== |
===[[Group FMG]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group FMG}}</ul></div> |
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group FMG}}</ul></div> |
||
:{{la|Group FMG}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group FMG (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 27#{{anchorencode:Group FMG}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Group_FMG_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Group FMG}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group FMG (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 27#{{anchorencode:Group FMG}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Group_FMG_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Group FMG}}) |
:({{Find sources|Group FMG}}) |
||
Not notable. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 00:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
Not notable. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 00:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
* '''Weak Keep''' barely enough RS ... would be nice if the external links could be nixed [[User:BlueSalix|BlueSalix]] ([[User talk:BlueSalix|talk]]) 00:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/New York|list of New York-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising|list of Advertising-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Keep''' - Added Hoover's ref, making it close enough to [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:VMS Mosaic|VMS Mosaic]] ([[User talk:VMS Mosaic|talk]]) 03:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' - won 4 Webbys which is like the Oscars for media. Notable. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tgrbengal|Tgrbengal]] ([[User talk:Tgrbengal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tgrbengal|contribs]]) 11:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
*'''Keep''' - winner of an award from PrintWeek <ref> http://www.printweek.in/News/358853,winner-of-printweek-india-creative-repro-company-of-the-year-2013.aspx </ref> |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 7 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Group FMG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Keep barely enough RS ... would be nice if the external links could be nixed BlueSalix (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Added Hoover's ref, making it close enough to WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - won 4 Webbys which is like the Oscars for media. Notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgrbengal (talk • contribs) 11:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - winner of an award from PrintWeek [1]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.