Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Joseph (Geoshrad): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:52, 7 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Joseph (Geoshrad)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website Polarpanda (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. Please, Polarpanda, use a tool to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;) --Pgallert (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficient evidence of notability.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wait Data is being Added up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.144.134.242 (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is from Geoshrad, not about him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --Pgallert (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:Secret|Secret]] <sup>[[User talk:Secret|account]]</sup> 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[George Joseph (Geoshrad)]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|George Joseph (Geoshrad)}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Joseph (Geoshrad)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 December 2#{{anchorencode:George Joseph (Geoshrad)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 :({{findsources|George Joseph (Geoshrad)}})
 the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website [[User:Polarpanda|Polarpanda]] ([[User talk:Polarpanda|talk]]) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. <small>Please, Polarpanda, use a [[WP:Twinkle|tool]] to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;)</small> --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
+::Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. Insufficient evidence of notability.--[[User:JohnnyB256|JohnnyB256]] ([[User talk:JohnnyB256|talk]]) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
+*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography|list of Photography-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Wait''' Data is being Added up  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.144.134.242|202.144.134.242]] ([[User talk:202.144.134.242|talk]]) 15:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+*:'''Comment:''' Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is ''from'' Geoshrad, not ''about'' him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>