Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Joseph (Geoshrad): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:52, 7 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Joseph (Geoshrad)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website Polarpanda (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. Please, Polarpanda, use a tool to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;) --Pgallert (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficient evidence of notability.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wait Data is being Added up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.144.134.242 (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is from Geoshrad, not about him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --Pgallert (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Revision as of 01:38, 9 December 2009 edit RenamedUser jaskldjslak903 (talk \| contribs) 9,168 edits close discussion: delete ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 09:52, 7 February 2022 edit undo MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*:'''Comment:''' Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is ''from'' Geoshrad, not ''about'' him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --[[User:Pgallert\|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert\|talk]]) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)		*:'''Comment:''' Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is ''from'' Geoshrad, not ''about'' him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --[[User:Pgallert\|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert\|talk]]) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>