Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equato Encryption: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:55, 8 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per G7 criteria, as the author requested deletion (and also blanked the article) and nobody else has provided substantial content. -- Atama頭 18:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Equato Encryption

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article describes a concept created by a pair of college freshmen within the past week or so. The article was written by one of those students, violating WP:NFT completely. Of course, nothing in this article is verifiable. The list of references at the end have little or nothing to do with the article's text. Atama頭 16:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For reasons stated exactly by nominator. Nageh (talk) 16:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Atama頭 16:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snow delete. This is the sort of thing that sometimes makes me wish WP:NFT were a speedy deletion criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - I agree, in fact I suggested to Nageh that it might be a good proposal for WT:CSD. I wish I could have deleted it under that criteria or any other and saved the trouble to bring it here. -- Atama頭 18:11, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a submitted research paper at NSS 2011, an international conference on network and system security. Link to a copy of the paper = [1]. There are nothing verifiable on this article yet and can be deleted in that terms. And how does being a college freshmen matter? Wikipedia asks one to be tolerant to others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.102.18 (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may delete the article immediately as it is unable to provide anything verifiable yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayan092 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, your paper is just as vague as the Wikipedia article. Concerning your freshmenship, this has nothing to do with the discussion indeed. In fact, I expressed appreciation for your efforts into research, but Wikipedia is not the place for this. ~~Concerning immediate deletion, as you contested the earlier deletion proposal this has to go through a discussion phase now before being deleted.~~ Oh well, it's deleted. All the best, Nageh (talk) 18:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[Equato Encryption]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''speedily deleted''' per [[WP:CSD#G7|G7]] criteria, as the author requested deletion (and also blanked the article) and nobody else has provided substantial content. -- '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]]'''[[User talk:Atama|<span style="color:#000">頭</span>]] 18:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
+===[[Equato Encryption]]===
 :{{la|Equato Encryption}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equato Encryption|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 May 11#{{anchorencode:Equato Encryption}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources|Equato Encryption}})
 This article describes a concept created by a pair of college freshmen within the past week or so. The article was written by one of those students, violating [[WP:NFT]] completely. Of course, nothing in this article is verifiable. The list of references at the end have little or nothing to do with the article's text. '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]]'''[[User talk:Atama|<span style="color:#000">頭</span>]] 16:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. For reasons stated exactly by nominator. [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 16:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small> -- '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]]'''[[User talk:Atama|<span style="color:#000">頭</span>]] 16:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)</small>
+*'''[[WP:SNOW|Snow]] delete'''. This is the sort of thing that sometimes makes me wish [[WP:NFT]] were a speedy deletion criterion. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 16:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
+:*'''Reply''' - I agree, in fact I suggested to Nageh that it might be a good proposal for [[WT:CSD]]. I wish I could have deleted it under that criteria or any other and saved the trouble to bring it here. -- '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]]'''[[User talk:Atama|<span style="color:#000">頭</span>]] 18:11, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
+This article is a submitted research paper at NSS 2011, an international conference on network and system security. Link to a copy of the paper = [https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=1uZm8Qzd-BeSm9r_WtbzSNWPGKZRCQQY7ktMS4u4P1fDgzETXyUqlA92mZNdk&hl=en&authkey=CNPLxJ4P]. There are nothing verifiable on this article yet and can be deleted in that terms. And how does being a college freshmen matter? Wikipedia asks one to be tolerant to others.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.124.102.18|124.124.102.18]] ([[User talk:124.124.102.18|talk]]) 17:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+You may delete the article immediately as it is unable to provide anything verifiable yet.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ayan092|Ayan092]] ([[User talk:Ayan092|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ayan092|contribs]]) 18:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:Sigh, your paper is just as vague as the Wikipedia article. Concerning your freshmenship, this has nothing to do with the discussion indeed. In fact, I expressed appreciation for your efforts into research, but Wikipedia is not the place for this. <s>Concerning immediate deletion, as you contested the earlier deletion proposal this has to go through a discussion phase now before being deleted.</s> Oh well, it's deleted. All the best, [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 18:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>