Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holocene Impact Working Group: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:03, 8 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Holocene Impact Working Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is zero coverage of this group as an entity, as opposed to their (fringe) research. This isn't surprising; we rarely (if ever?) have articles on individual labs or research groups. – Joe (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting work, but the group as an entity has not at this point received anything beyond passing/incidental mention in literature (as one does when stating affiliation to some research collective). Based on current practice, a research group needs to receive quite some coverage in its own right before it merits a standalone article. I suggest the group's findings are better suited to the individual topic articles (megatsunami, impact event), or the articles on individual researchers, which exist for a couple of the members. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Holocene Impact Working Group]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''.  [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 19:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
+===[[:Holocene Impact Working Group]]===
 :{{la|Holocene Impact Working Group}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holocene Impact Working Group|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 28#{{anchorencode:Holocene Impact Working Group}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Holocene_Impact_Working_Group Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|Holocene Impact Working Group}})
@@ Line 11: / Line 16: @@
 :'''Delete''' Interesting work, but the group as an entity has not at this point received anything beyond passing/incidental mention in literature (as one does when stating affiliation to some research collective). Based on current practice, a research group needs to receive quite some coverage in its own right before it merits a standalone article. I suggest the group's findings are better suited to the individual topic articles ([[megatsunami]], [[impact event]]), or the articles on individual researchers, which exist for a couple of the members. --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 22:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' as [[WP:Too soon]]. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC).
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>