Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bohan: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Joe Decker|j⚛e decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk</i></small></sup>]] 02:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
===[[John Bohan]]=== |
===[[John Bohan]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
:{{la|John Bohan}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bohan|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March |
:{{la|John Bohan}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bohan|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 30#{{anchorencode:John Bohan}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Bohan Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources|John Bohan}}) |
:({{Find sources|John Bohan}}) |
||
Not notable. It appears the most notable thing he's done was being convicted for fraud. < |
Not notable. It appears the most notable thing he's done was being convicted for fraud. [[User:Greedo8|<span style="color:#191970;">Greedo</span>]][[User talk:Greedo8|<span style="color:#696969;">8</span>]] 16:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising|list of Advertising-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising|list of Advertising-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
Line 10: | Line 16: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' No in depth coverage in articles.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 20:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' No in depth coverage in articles.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 20:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' His conviction for fraud is highly relevant for anyone researching his background. I suspect the request to delete was made by him or someone in his camp. [[Special:Contributions/76.94.216.84|76.94.216.84]] ([[User talk:76.94.216.84|talk]]) 23:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' His conviction for fraud is highly relevant for anyone researching his background. I suspect the request to delete was made by him or someone in his camp. [[Special:Contributions/76.94.216.84|76.94.216.84]] ([[User talk:76.94.216.84|talk]]) 23:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) <small>— [[Special:Contributions/76.94.216.84|76.94.216.84]] ([[User talk:76.94.216.84|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
||
::*'''Comment''', Please try to keep all conversation [[WP:Civil|civil]], and stay on the topic of his notability. I am highly offended by your baseless accusations of being "in his camp." Furthermore, just because someone was convicted of a crime it does not mean they deserve a wikipedia article. < |
::*'''Comment''', Please try to keep all conversation [[WP:Civil|civil]], and stay on the topic of his notability. I am highly offended by your baseless accusations of being "in his camp." Furthermore, just because someone was convicted of a crime it does not mean they deserve a wikipedia article. [[User:Greedo8|<span style="color:#191970;">Greedo</span>]][[User talk:Greedo8|<span style="color:#696969;">8</span>]] 02:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
:::OK boys, relax both of you. Greedo8, there is not anything to be offended about. IP, do not accuse someone without any proof of it though I think you did it in good faith I do not recommend it. . --[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 09:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
|||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 16:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
*'''weak keep''' - apparently this "simple fraud" has been covered a lot in media. --[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 09:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User: |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 18:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
*'''delete''' as per WP:BLP1E. Take the fraud away and he's barely noticed. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 13:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' I agree with [[User:LibStar]]! [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 16:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 08:42, 8 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- John Bohan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. It appears the most notable thing he's done was being convicted for fraud. Greedo8 16:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No in depth coverage in articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep His conviction for fraud is highly relevant for anyone researching his background. I suspect the request to delete was made by him or someone in his camp. 76.94.216.84 (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) — 76.94.216.84 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Comment, Please try to keep all conversation civil, and stay on the topic of his notability. I am highly offended by your baseless accusations of being "in his camp." Furthermore, just because someone was convicted of a crime it does not mean they deserve a wikipedia article. Greedo8 02:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- OK boys, relax both of you. Greedo8, there is not anything to be offended about. IP, do not accuse someone without any proof of it though I think you did it in good faith I do not recommend it. . --BabbaQ (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- weak keep - apparently this "simple fraud" has been covered a lot in media. --BabbaQ (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete as per WP:BLP1E. Take the fraud away and he's barely noticed. LibStar (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with User:LibStar! SarahStierch (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.