Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminal accusation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 11:45, 9 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nja²⁴⁷ 19:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criminal accusation

I found this page deleted (prodded). It seems an important topic to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep The person who prodded gave the reason "since the merge hasn't happened and it has been nine or so months, I suggest that the article be deleted if only to give the admins a kick in the butt to merge this important article". 1) This fails the prod criteria. Since there appears to be a consensus to merge a deletion would obviously not be uncontroversial which is what PROD is for. 2) Deletion is not cleanup. 3) There is no need to kick administrator's to perform the merge. Anyone can, including the person who prodded the article in the first place. 4) Article can be redirected with a note on the target page so a merge can be performed later. In short: No one provided a valid reason to delete. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - relevant subject - Skysmith (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:DICDEF. Dlabtot (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. [[User:Nja247|<em style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:#6600CC">'''''Nja'''''</em>]]<sup>[[User talk:Nja247|<em style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:#63D1F4">'''''247'''''</em>]]</sup> 19:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[Criminal accusation]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
 :{{la|Criminal accusation}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Criminal accusation|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminal accusation]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminal accusation|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 April 24#{{anchorencode:Criminal accusation}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 *I found this page deleted (prodded). It seems an important topic to me. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 05:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy keep''' The person who prodded gave the reason "since the merge hasn't happened and it has been nine or so months, I suggest that the article be deleted if only to give the admins a kick in the butt to merge this important article". 1) This fails the prod criteria. Since there appears to be a consensus to merge a deletion would obviously not be uncontroversial which is what PROD is for. 2) Deletion is not cleanup. 3) There is no need to kick administrator's to perform the merge. Anyone can, including the person who prodded the article in the first place. 4) Article can be redirected with a note on the target page so a merge can be performed later. In short: No one provided a valid reason to delete. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' - relevant subject - [[User:Skysmith|Skysmith]] ([[User talk:Skysmith|talk]]) 10:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' [[WP:DICDEF]]. [[User:Dlabtot|Dlabtot]] ([[User talk:Dlabtot|talk]]) 17:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>