Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Charrow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:56, 10 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Charrow

Non-notable lawyer/official for the Reagan administration. Notability tag has been on article since June 2007. Cunard (talk) 07:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete barring establishment of notability through independent sources. This article can be easily recreated later if sources are uncovered in the future. -Verdatum (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If any of the users who'd been throwing tags on this article (the first 14 seconds after the author's first edit, driving him away) had bothered to research, they'd have noticed that Charrow is a highly-prominent, often-published, often enough the subject of major press coverage, attorney and US government official. http://www.gtlaw.com/People/RobertPCharrow The Enchantress Of Florence (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Expand and bio-stub templates were added 14 minutes after the article was created. The rest of the tags were added months later. -- Swerdnaneb 00:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trim. Per Google. It's out there. He's an active news-maker. I think the details of his life (which dominate the article right now) could be left out. -- Swerdnaneb 00:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''.  [[User:Falcon Kirtaran|--Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran]] ([[User talk:Falcon Kirtaran|talk]]) 08:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 ===[[Robert Charrow]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Robert Charrow}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Robert Charrow|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Charrow]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Charrow|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 20#{{anchorencode:Robert Charrow}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 6: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' barring establishment of notability through independent sources.  This article can be easily recreated later if sources are uncovered in the future. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 16:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''. If any of the users who'd been throwing tags on this article (the first 14 seconds after the author's first edit, driving him away) had bothered to research, they'd have noticed that Charrow is a highly-prominent, often-published, often enough the subject of major press coverage, attorney and US government official.  http://www.gtlaw.com/People/RobertPCharrow [[User:The Enchantress Of Florence|The Enchantress Of Florence]] ([[User talk:The Enchantress Of Florence|talk]])  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment was added at 18:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+**Expand and bio-stub templates were added 14 minutes after the article was created. The rest of the tags were added months later. -- [[User:Swerdnaneb|Swerdnaneb]] 00:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Keep and trim.''' Per [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=Robert+Charrow Google]. It's out there. He's an active news-maker. I think the details of his life (which dominate the article right now) could be left out. -- [[User:Swerdnaneb|Swerdnaneb]] 00:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>