Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deceiver.com: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:45, 11 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deceiver.com

Delete - A non-notable blog and non-notable blogger. The article depends almost entirely on primary sources, suffers a poverty of reliable third-party coverage and hence does not meet the notability threshold. In addition, the page is orphaned and will likely remain so. [1] This blog receives only a bare mention in 3 or 4 online publications: Slate, [2] ocregister.com, and a brief nod in The Daily Telegraph (Australia) [3]. But the article stretches these sources well beyond breaking point. According to the site's own "about" page, "Deceiver.com is a project of Hat Tip Media". [4] There is not a single mention of "Hat Tip Media" anywhere on the Internet. [5] It would appear the proprietor of Deceiver.com (James Seaver, a.k.a. "Oversneer") has been busy promoting his blog all over the Internet, mostly in the comment section of other blogs, in an effort to push up its page rank. Deceive.com further solicited their readers to create this page here on Wikipedia, which they happily did, including a section to its very own online Shop. Interestingly and perhaps tellingly, the proprietor also nominated Deceiver.com for 4 "Blogger Choice Awards", but garnered zero support, receiving not a single vote. Best Gossip Blog: Deceiver.com = 0 votes [6]

Delete - Harsh, but valid and supported by facts, especially the part about the self promotion and Blogger Choice Awards. And I could not help but scoff when they presented the Wiki page as being some spontaneous, unexpected event when they in fact emailed their supporters to ask someone to step up and create the page. Thesetrixaintforkids (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = Sadly I looked into this and found that, yeah, the comments above are correct. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 03:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. -- 7triton7 (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. -- samj _in ^out 16:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[Deceiver.com]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
 :{{la|Deceiver.com}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Deceiver.com|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deceiver.com]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deceiver.com|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 March 11#{{anchorencode:Deceiver.com}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' - Harsh, but valid and supported by facts, especially the part about the self promotion and Blogger Choice Awards. And I could not help but scoff when they presented the Wiki page as being some spontaneous, unexpected event when they in fact emailed their supporters to ask someone to step up and create the page. [[User:Thesetrixaintforkids|Thesetrixaintforkids]] ([[User talk:Thesetrixaintforkids|talk]]) 21:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' = Sadly I looked into this and found that, yeah, the comments above are correct.  [[User:Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth|Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth]] ([[User talk:Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth|talk]]) 03:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as per above. -- [[User:7triton7|7triton7]] ([[User talk:7triton7|talk]]) 04:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per above. -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">[[User:SamJohnston|samj]] <small>[[User talk:Samj|<sub style="color:maroon;">in</sub>]][[Special:Contributions/SamJohnston|<sup style="color:green;">out</sup>]]</small></u> 16:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>