Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industrial Style: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
"Closing AfD, result was keep (nomination withdrawn)." |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
||
Latest revision as of 07:19, 11 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Industrial Style (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research, see talk page for more info. Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 23:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete - This has been around most of a decade without improvement since 2007 other than categories. Having no article is better than an article that consists of nothing except original research. The topic exists and is likely notable, but the only way to make the article compliant with policy is to nuke it and wait for someone interested in doing it right. In short, nuke it and let someone start over if they want. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep now that it has been stubified and sourced. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete If there is such a thing as "Industrial Style", it would be in interior design, where polished concrete floors and exposed brickwork feature prominently in open concepts. See for example this article from the WSJ. The examples given in the current revision describe a style of automotive design for which, as far as I can tell, no sources exist.Mduvekot (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)- Keep Now that the article has been rewritten, I no longer have any objections. Mduvekot (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Ihaveacatonmydesk, Mduvekot and Dennis Brown please have another look. I have edited the article to remove original research and add references. ~Kvng (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm ok with that, although I'm not sure that "Style" should be capitalized. It isn't perfect, but it gets it down to the bare bones of what the topic is supposed to cover, and at first glance, has sources. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is not a proper noun so Style should not be capitalized.It might create a mess to move it while AfD is in progress so I'll wait. ~Kvng (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Since the article has been totally re-written I can withdraw the nomination (I guess?). Mduvekot hasn't replied yet but it looks like he wouldn't be opposed to having an article about the interior design trend. Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 18:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.