Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Chameleon '92: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:54, 11 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Chameleon '92

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any real notability within the context of the Siege of Sarajevo and the Bosnian War. There aren't any real results for Operation Chameleon '92 on Google Books, which leads me to believe that a deletion (or merger with Siege of Sarajevo) is best. 23 editor (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see anything in this article that isn't already covered by Siege of Sarajevo and that's clearly the superior article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorgath (talk • contribs) 17:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[WP:SOFTDELETE]]. [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub>[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only</span>]]</sub> 13:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 ===[[Operation Chameleon '92]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|I}}
 :{{la|Operation Chameleon '92}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Chameleon &#39;92|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 19#{{anchorencode:Operation Chameleon '92}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Operation_Chameleon_%2792 Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 12: / Line 18: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
+*'''Delete.''' I don't see anything in this article that isn't already covered by [[Siege of Sarajevo]] and that's clearly the superior article.  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jorgath|Jorgath]] ([[User talk:Jorgath|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jorgath|contribs]]) 17:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>