Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Carnaille: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 10:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC) |
|||
===[[:Quentin Carnaille]]=== |
===[[:Quentin Carnaille]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
:{{la|Quentin Carnaille}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Carnaille|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/ |
:{{la|Quentin Carnaille}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Carnaille|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 2#{{anchorencode:Quentin Carnaille}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quentin_Carnaille Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Quentin Carnaille}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Quentin Carnaille}}) |
||
Interesting work, but I don't see how he is yet notable '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 22:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC) |
Interesting work, but I don't see how he is yet notable '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 22:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
Line 8: | Line 15: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' in agreement with {{u|Mduvekot}}, incomprehensible mess of artspeak is pretty much dead on and I'm not sure what in the article establishes notability. <span style="background:#957;padding:2px 12px;font-size:12px">[[User:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#CC0">Chrissymad</span>]] <span style="color:#FC0;letter-spacing:-2px">❯❯❯</span> [[User talk:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#CC0">¯\_(ツ)_/¯</span>]]</span> |
|||
*'''Keep'''. Article gives enough facts to be notable. [[User:Materialsciontist|Materialsciontist]] ([[User talk:Materialsciontist|talk]]) 11:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
|||
*'''Delete''' to be honest, it borders on [[WP:PROMO]]. Otherwise, it's not that great of an article, full of artspeak and no real evidence of notability. Worst case, this is a [[WP:TNT]] candidate, and if someone else can rewrite in a way that shows it should be in an encyclopedia, it can be included. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 01:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 10:42, 11 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Quentin Carnaille (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Interesting work, but I don't see how he is yet notable DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. Mduvekot (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete in agreement with Mduvekot, incomprehensible mess of artspeak is pretty much dead on and I'm not sure what in the article establishes notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete to be honest, it borders on WP:PROMO. Otherwise, it's not that great of an article, full of artspeak and no real evidence of notability. Worst case, this is a WP:TNT candidate, and if someone else can rewrite in a way that shows it should be in an encyclopedia, it can be included. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.