Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AR15.com (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:21, 12 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid 64 01:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AR15.com

Requested sources almost 3 months ago, but none have been provided. As it is, the article is highly original research and has shown no improvement. The "Further reading" section and "external links" sections link to a couple brief (and trivial, imo) media mentions. This website doesn't seem to satisfy WP:WEB or have any extraordinary claims of notability. Fyi, there was a previous but uneventful AFD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AR15.com. Delete as failing WP:OR, WP:WEB, and WP:V.

Delete, non notable community website. BJ^Talk 18:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Alexa rank >20,000, no obvious major coverage. --Dhartung | Talk 21:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SakotGrimshine 18:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do NOT Delete as BBS has sufficient number of members to qualify for notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.3.103.17 (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *'''Do NOT Delete''' as BBS has sufficient number of members to qualify for notability. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/71.3.103.17|71.3.103.17]] ([[User talk:71.3.103.17|talk]]) 00:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
-Who's the slimy little communist shit, twinkle-toed cocksucker down here who just signed his own death warrant? Nobody, huh? The fairy fucking godmother edited this?
-This is bullshit. The site has thousands of members and is extraordinarily popular. This deletion needs to be reconsidered. I hardly think some shithead from India should be deleting articles like this.
-R()()lz 4 life!~
-Some goddamn indian hippie motherfucker who got shit canned from his callcenter job at dell is nominating arfcom to be deleted? You better straighten your shit out snake charmer and start shitting me tiffany cufflinks.