Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bank House: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:56, 12 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bank House

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A one line stub. There seems to be nothing online, apart from the very occasional real estate listing, to show the building has any notability. Sionk (talk) 22:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article lacks reliable sources showing any notability, even if the single source in the article were sufficient, it doesn't describe anything notable about the building, only that it exists; article fails WP:GNG. - Sudo Ghost 18:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- There are a limited number of tall buildings in central Birmingham. I do not regard this as a particularly notable one. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub>[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only</span>]]</sub> 23:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 ===[[Bank House]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|Bank House}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bank House|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 7#{{anchorencode:Bank House}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bank_House Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources|Bank House}})
 A one line stub. There seems to be nothing online, apart from the very occasional real estate listing, to show the building has any notability. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 22:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:28, 8 July 2012 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Architecture|list of Architecture-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete''' - Article lacks reliable sources showing any notability, even if the single source in the article were sufficient, it doesn't describe anything notable about the building, only that it exists; article fails [[WP:GNG]]. - [[User:SudoGhost|Sudo]][[User_talk:SudoGhost#top|Ghost]] 18:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' -- There are a limited number of tall buildings in central Birmingham.  I do not regard this as a particularly notable one.  [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 12:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>