Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Everingham Prize: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''merge to [[International Conference on Computer Vision]]'''. Merge any relevant material and then redirect to target -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 02:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
===[[Mark Everingham Prize]]===
===[[Mark Everingham Prize]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}


:{{la|Mark Everingham Prize}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Everingham Prize|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 16#{{anchorencode:Mark Everingham Prize}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mark_Everingham_Prize Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Mark Everingham Prize}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Everingham Prize|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 16#{{anchorencode:Mark Everingham Prize}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mark_Everingham_Prize Stats]</span>)
Line 9: Line 15:
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 02:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 02:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Merge''' with [[International Conference on Computer Vision]] (ICCV, held in odd numbered years) and the [[European Conference on Computer Vision]] (ECCV, held in even numbered years). Fails to meet notability as a stand-alone article. Notably more awkward than with awards given at one conference consistently, but the division of the twin conferences is somewhat awkward in general. Within the articles, you could have a single paragraph explaining the award, linking to the sibling conference's Mark Everingham Prize section, and listing the awards given at that particular conference. ––[[User:Agyle|Agyle]] ([[User talk:Agyle|talk]]) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' with [[International Conference on Computer Vision]] (ICCV, held in odd numbered years) and the [[European Conference on Computer Vision]] (ECCV, held in even numbered years). Fails to meet notability as a stand-alone article. Notably more awkward than with awards given at one conference consistently, but the division of the twin conferences is somewhat awkward in general. Within the articles, you could have a single paragraph explaining the award, linking to the sibling conference's Mark Everingham Prize section, and listing the awards given at that particular conference. ––[[User:Agyle|Agyle]] ([[User talk:Agyle|talk]]) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Merge'''/'''Redirect''' to [[International Conference on Computer Vision]] per nom and Agyle.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 07:39, 13 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to International Conference on Computer Vision. Merge any relevant material and then redirect to target -- RoySmith (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Everingham Prize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was dePRODed by its author. While this prize may well be notable, there are concerns that insufficient third-party sources exist in order to comply with Wikipedia's notability criteria for stand-alone articles, and where the named recipients may not be notable according to WP:BLP, WP:LISTPEOPLE, and WP:NLIST. One solution may be merging to the main article at IEEE Computer Society. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAMI Young Researcher Award. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge with International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV, held in odd numbered years) and the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV, held in even numbered years). Fails to meet notability as a stand-alone article. Notably more awkward than with awards given at one conference consistently, but the division of the twin conferences is somewhat awkward in general. Within the articles, you could have a single paragraph explaining the award, linking to the sibling conference's Mark Everingham Prize section, and listing the awards given at that particular conference. ––Agyle (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.