Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rúni Brattaberg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:27, 13 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 13:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rúni Brattaberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in this article is properly sourced, I cannot find any significant information about Rúni Brattaberg on the web, and it seems that the subject of the article is it's main contributor. Illinois2011 (talk) 04:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Seems to have had plenty of roles in productions that have received coverage. Google Books shows coverage in The Wire and Opera, and there are several reviews in non-English sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Nothing that could really be called significant coverage of Rúni Brattaberg, but indication that he is significant enough in his field.--Michig (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I see coverage from multiple language reliable sources. Cavarrone (talk) 20:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Barely passes GNG, but has sufficient RS coverage.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (grinding my teeth). He's notable and has sung major roles in major opera houses. The article was in reasonable shape after User:Voceditenore added some reliable sources in March 2010 and some subsequent edits by others. It then went steadily downhill after User:Brattaberg started editing it this January. Still, WP:COI and lack of WP:COMPETENCE are no reasons to delete. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment When I listed this article for deletion, I had not seen the non-english sources and therefore I didn't really think there were any sources on the guy. You can imagine what I thought with no sources and the article being constantly edited by what appears to be the guy himself. If he is truly notable, then let's clean up the article and move on. Illinois2011 (talk) 01:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) [[User:Armbrust|Armbrust, B.Ed.]] [[User talk:Armbrust|<sup style="color:#E3A857;">Let's talk</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|<sub style="color:#008000;">about my edits?</sub>]] 13:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 ===[[Rúni Brattaberg]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Rúni Brattaberg}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rúni Brattaberg|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 27#{{anchorencode:Rúni Brattaberg}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Weak keep'''. Seems to have had plenty of roles in productions that have received coverage. Google Books shows coverage in ''The Wire'' and ''Opera'', and there are several reviews in non-English sources: [http://www.morgenweb.de/service/archiv/artikel/688883599.html], [http://www.rundschau-online.de/html/artikel/1246895339242.shtml], [http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/22ecf2d4-35f9-11df-9e2e-1a5548daf203%7C0], [http://www.dradio.de/dkultur/sendungen/fazit/1428580/], [http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/02f58ab2-35c8-11df-9e2e-1a5548daf203%7C1]. Nothing that could really be called significant coverage of Rúni Brattaberg, but indication that he is significant enough in his field.--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 19:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''', I see coverage from multiple language reliable sources. [[User:Cavarrone|Cavarrone]] ([[User talk:Cavarrone|talk]]) 20:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''.  Barely passes GNG, but has sufficient RS coverage.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 23:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' (grinding my teeth). He's notable and has sung major roles in major opera houses. The article was in reasonable shape after [[User:Voceditenore]] added some reliable sources in March 2010 and some subsequent edits by others. It then went steadily downhill after [[User:Brattaberg]] started editing it this January. Still, [[WP:COI]] and lack of [[WP:COMPETENCE]] are no reasons to delete. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 12:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
+:'''Comment''' When I listed this article for deletion, I had not seen the non-english sources and therefore I didn't really think there were any sources on the guy. You can imagine what I thought with no sources and the article being constantly edited by what appears to be the guy himself. If he is truly notable, then let's clean up the article and move on. [[User:Illinois2011|Illinois2011]] ([[User talk:Illinois2011|talk]]) 01:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>