Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Day of Research: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
deletion reasons |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 14:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
===[[A Day of Research]]=== |
===[[A Day of Research]]=== |
||
Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by [[Gerling]], but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by [[Gerling]], but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong delete''' per nom. Is that '''5''' cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! [[User:TrackerTV|TrackerTV]] <small>([[User talk:TrackerTV|CW]]|[[Special:Contributions/TrackerTV|Castform]]|[[Special:Emailuser/TrackerTV|Green Valley]])</small> 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong delete''' and I'm getting rid of the cleanup tags in the meantime. There is absolutely no reason to have them on a page, IMO, as long as it's up for deletion. It sends a mixed message, for one thing. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete — ''' Fails everything, and I mean everything. [[User:SynergeticMaggot|SynergeticMaggot]] 12:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - per nom. [[User:Angelbo|Angelbo]] 21:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong delete''' per nom. —[[User:Bluedustmite|Michael Hays]] 16:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |