User talk:Tstormcandy: Difference between revisions
Tstormcandy (talk | contribs) vaguely attempting to add an archive bot |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
| algo=old(90d) |
|||
| archive={{User_talk:Tstormcandy}}/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| counter=3 |
|||
| maxarchivesize=400K |
|||
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
| minthreadsleft=0 |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive=3 |
|||
}} |
|||
==Welcome== |
==Welcome== |
||
<big>''' |
<big>'''Hello!''' If you'd like to leave a new message please hit the little + sign or "New Section" up there in the top right, and you'll get your own new area!. Write me about anything! Thanks!</big> |
||
<br /> |
<br /> |
||
<br /> |
<br /> |
||
''The original welcome message I was sent:''<br /> |
''The original welcome message I was sent when I joined Wikipedia:''<br /> |
||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]{{#if:|, especially what you did for [[:{{{art}}}]]}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: |
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]{{#if:|, especially what you did for [[:{{{art}}}]]}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: |
||
Line 22: | Line 12: | ||
*[[Wikipedia:Your first article|How to create your first article]] (using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard2.0|Article Wizard]] if you wish) |
*[[Wikipedia:Your first article|How to create your first article]] (using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard2.0|Article Wizard]] if you wish) |
||
*[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] |
*[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] |
||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign]] your messages on [[Wikipedia:talk page|discussion page]]s using four [[tilde]]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on {{#if:|[[user talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> ➜<span style="font-family:arial black;color:OrangeRed;">Redvers</span><small><small><sup>'''[[User talk:Redvers|talk]]''' ❝[[User:Redvers/SN|It's bona to vada your dolly old eek]]❞</sup></small></small> 07:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC) |
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign]] your messages on [[Wikipedia:talk page|discussion page]]s using four [[tilde]]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on {{#if:|[[user talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> ➜<span style="font-family:arial black;color:OrangeRed;">Redvers</span><small><small><sup>'''[[User talk:Redvers|talk]]''' ❝[[User:Redvers/SN|It's bona to vada your dolly old eek]]❞</sup></small></small> 07:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)<br /> |
||
⚫ | |||
==Archives== |
==Archives== |
||
Line 42: | Line 33: | ||
I will attempt to reply to any messages left at my earliest convenience. Messages about Administrator discussion or proposed article deleted generally take priority over any other work. Post about any of my actions you take exception to or are just annoyed/disgusted/frustrated with me over, as well. Really, anything. Follow [[WP:CIVIL|our civility policies]] and always make an attempt to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] on initial contact and things generally work out for the better. Best wishes, and I hope you enjoy your time at Wikipedia. |
I will attempt to reply to any messages left at my earliest convenience. Messages about Administrator discussion or proposed article deleted generally take priority over any other work. Post about any of my actions you take exception to or are just annoyed/disgusted/frustrated with me over, as well. Really, anything. Follow [[WP:CIVIL|our civility policies]] and always make an attempt to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] on initial contact and things generally work out for the better. Best wishes, and I hope you enjoy your time at Wikipedia. |
||
== |
== Your new section here! == |
||
(Enter text here) |
|||
== Another new section here! == |
|||
(Enter text here) |
|||
[[File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg|right|130px]] |
|||
== Reference Errors on 4 December == |
|||
Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer<tt>" userright, allowing you to [[WP:Reviewing|review other users' edits]] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a [[WP:Pending changes|two-month trial]] scheduled to end 15 August 2010. |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: |
|||
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not [[wp:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only [[Special:StablePages|a small number of articles]], similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at [[Special:OldReviewedPages]]. |
|||
*On the [[:Richard Caring]] page, [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=636619805 your edit] caused a [[:Category:Pages with URL errors|URL error]] <small>([[Help:CS1_errors#Check_.7Curl.3D_scheme|help]])</small>. ([{{fullurl:Richard Caring|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AReferenceBot%7CReferenceBot%5D%5D}} Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F636619805%7C{{Replace|Richard Caring| |%20}}%5D%5D Ask for help]) |
|||
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new report it to my operator]. |
|||
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->[[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]] ([[User talk:ReferenceBot|talk]]) 00:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Fredrick Brennan]] == |
|||
For the guideline on reviewing, see [[Wikipedia:Reviewing]]. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found [[Help:Pending changes|here]], and the general policy for the trial can be found [[Wikipedia:Pending changes|here]]. |
|||
Specific suggestions to make less fluffy? --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 15:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.<!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> —[[User:Department of Redundancy Department|DoRD]] ([[User talk:Department of Redundancy Department|talk]]) 15:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:It's not that the article is, in and of itself, entirely "fluffy". It's also not really the reason I put myself to "weak keep"... That's more of a matter of notability not automatically being inherited from [[8chan]]; Also recentism along the lines of [[WP:15MOF]]. The style issue for me is the hinge on the disability and it reading like a human interest story and not terribly encyclopedic until the 8chan section. |
|||
⚫ | |||
:: Thanks. So, more on the 8chan section. If there are other suggestions you can make to improve the article, that would be great. I'm not worried about the AFD any more, but, well, improvement is always good. --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 20:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::: Honestly? At this point I'd personally keep it as short and straight as possible and wait it out awhile. By BLP standards and the "equivalent" internet sites like [[4chan]] that have been around for so long for a near-infinite amount of media coverage to occur? This is brand new comparatively. The article doesn't necessary need to be trimmed but further growth would just welcome edit warring, [[WP:RS|RS]] bickering and the NPOV stuff that's mostly stayed away to this point. |
|||
⚫ | ::: I apologize for this being a sort of non-answer answer, but it's my style. I by and large [[WP:AGF|AGF]] that people who edit the actual content know what they're doing and we have talk pages for this stuff. So, again, I'd just have to recommend that it not grow much for now. <b>♪</b> <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Tstormcandy|Tstorm]][[User talk:Tstormcandy|(talk)]]</span> 06:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::: "The article you wrote sucks. Don't change a thing."? --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 15:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::::: I don't recall saying it sucks and I'm sorry if that's the impression I was giving. I just have some gripes on a personal style level. That's all. What "quality" means varies heavily from person-to-person. Since I don't believe in any form of [[WP:OWN|ownership]] I'm not going to claim I know better than anyone else on any other article. I can just give advice based on things I've seen in the past. I'm sorry I couldn't be of much help to you. <b>♪</b> <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Tstormcandy|Tstorm]][[User talk:Tstormcandy|(talk)]]</span> 03:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Reference errors on 13 June == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: |
|||
== Deshashta Brahmin == |
|||
*On the [[:Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe]] page, [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=666701405 your edit] caused a [[:Category:Pages_with_broken_reference_names|broken reference name]] <small>([[Help:Cite_errors/Cite_error_references_no_text|help]])</small>. ([{{fullurl:Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AReferenceBot%7CReferenceBot%5D%5D}} Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F666701405%7C{{Replace|Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe| |%20}}%5D%5D Ask for help]) |
|||
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new report it to my operator]. |
|||
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->[[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]] ([[User talk:ReferenceBot|talk]]) 00:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
You reverted my edit to the lead of [[Deshastha Brahmin]] AND the table I deleted from that article. Please take a look at the revision history and you will find the reasons for my action. Please undo the revert. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zuggernaut|Zuggernaut]] ([[User talk:Zuggernaut|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zuggernaut|contribs]]) 05:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
⚫ | :I apologize for |
||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Incident == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 --> |
|||
There's a discussion over at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Arilang1234|ANI]] on a user. I would appreciate your input. You were one of the editors participating in the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive663#Arilang1234|previous discussion]], and I'm currently informing all the editors involved--[[User:So God created Manchester|hkr]] [[User talk:So God created Manchester|<font color="orange">(''talk'')</font>]] 11:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | : |
||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == |
|||
== Possible interview about Palin/Revere edit war in June 2011 == |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tstormcandy. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
My name is Sara Marks and I am doing research for a masters thesis at Fitchburg State University. My thesis has to do with resolving conflicts on Wikipedia entries and I am focusing on what happened to the Paul Revere entry after Palin's comments last summer. I have been going through the archives and would really like to talk to you about what happened after her comments, especially your part in it. I want to get a better idea of what happened and your thoughts on the resolution process. You can get back to me on your talk page, my talk page or via email at librarygurl at gmail.com. I can also answer any questions you may have about my thesis. I look forward to hearing from you. --[[User:Librarygurl|LibraryGurl]] ([[User talk:Librarygurl|talk]]) 19:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
==November 2014== |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive265#Proposed Gamergate solution by Hasteur|community discussion]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[Gamergate controversy]].<br>The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate|here]]. |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 --> |
|||
== Bill Lichtenstein New York Times OpEd section perptuates trauma on his daughter Rose == |
|||
[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
Both are mentioned in the page he edits. WP:AVOIDVICTIM WP:COI I would like the whole nyt op ed taken down but then his "awards" for riding the trauma to fame and noteworthiness would be removed. So admin will have to decide. I am protecting Rose's privacy. I am her aunt and I love her. She has worked very hard to overcome the trauma. It does not belong in a Wikipedia page. She is a young, courageous woman. The inclusion of Rose in the OpEd was a huge mistake, to begin with. This Wikipedia page simply perpetuates Bill Lichtenstein's poor judgement once again. Once again, an external source must be called upon to rein him in. [[Special:Contributions/118.111.53.123|118.111.53.123]] ([[User talk:118.111.53.123|talk]]) 19:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 05:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg |
|||
| icon size = 50px}} |
|||
⚫ |
Latest revision as of 19:15, 17 February 2022
Welcome
[edit]Hello! If you'd like to leave a new message please hit the little + sign or "New Section" up there in the top right, and you'll get your own new area!. Write me about anything! Thanks!
The original welcome message I was sent when I joined Wikipedia:
Hello, Tstormcandy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! ➜Redverstalk ❝It's bona to vada your dolly old eek❞ 07:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Last Edited: ♪ Tstorm(talk) 13:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Archives
[edit]
|
|
All prior talk page discussion topics: Archive 1, Archive 2
→ !!! For visitors here flustered about edits:
[edit]Read below, then create a new section in the upper-right corner of this page and write all you'd like. Deleting and maintaining general control things can be important and the process is what keeps Wikipedia from collapsing in on itself within a matter of days (or hours). It's also sometimes not the most fun or glorious thing around for me to patrol and patch up. It's even less fun if something you created was changed or marked for deletion. It's entirely normal. Here are a few things to remember that can help solve the situation:
- No decision at Wikipedia is final. There are all sorts of means and methods and things to work on in Wikipedia's dispute resolution center. That should cover about 99% of troubles if you read through it a few times. I especially encourage a look over the "See Also" section and the menu under it, as it's a large collection of detailed reasoning behind many of our most fundamental guidelines and policies.
- My actions taken are never intended to be personal: When I'm going through vandalism patrol, civility concerns, incident discussion or other serious matters that can disrupt the encyclopedia, my aim is Justice. That comes first from the template set out by the community here (do note that, technically, we only have 1 rule however), bit also common sense and logic, evidence provided by other users, comments left by users, communications I may have had with other editors about certain situations, etc. There is never one easy answer, but that doesn't mean it's all terribly complicated.
- If any edit I made is confusing: Please let me know. I make mistakes. Everyone does, and hey I might even do it slightly more than average. "Usually" I can catch my mistakes and will quickly rush to revert the error and write a message of apology. You may also wish to run your username through the general Wikipedia search to see if you are currently seen at any incident boards which might also explain my edits or other unexpected actions.
- I cannot solve your situation if it will eventually require administrator assistance. Really, I wish I could help people more than I currently can, but we have guidelines for such things and I may need to suggest you take your concerns to an official discussion.
- Communicate! You'd be shocked at what a large percentage of low-level conflict can be averted or resolved through even 1 or 2 talk page messages between users. Really, it's astonishing, in the 80%+ range I'd say. Be proactive and contact a user if you so much as sense trouble brewing and you will likely never see it go farther. Of all actions taken I've taken at time of this writing, even with some controversial issues, I've only been vandalized and absolutely ignored on having a civil discussion with two different editors. Some messages at the top of sections below might look somewhat heated, but I'm always one to accept responsibility for my mistakes and we end up with no worries.
Generic Greeting to Would-Be Message Deliverers
[edit]I will attempt to reply to any messages left at my earliest convenience. Messages about Administrator discussion or proposed article deleted generally take priority over any other work. Post about any of my actions you take exception to or are just annoyed/disgusted/frustrated with me over, as well. Really, anything. Follow our civility policies and always make an attempt to assume good faith on initial contact and things generally work out for the better. Best wishes, and I hope you enjoy your time at Wikipedia.
Your new section here!
[edit](Enter text here)
Another new section here!
[edit](Enter text here)
Reference Errors on 4 December
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Richard Caring page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Specific suggestions to make less fluffy? --GRuban (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's not that the article is, in and of itself, entirely "fluffy". It's also not really the reason I put myself to "weak keep"... That's more of a matter of notability not automatically being inherited from 8chan; Also recentism along the lines of WP:15MOF. The style issue for me is the hinge on the disability and it reading like a human interest story and not terribly encyclopedic until the 8chan section.
- There's nothing inherently wrong with the article. It's just a matter of my personal BLP preferences. ♪ Tstorm(talk) 20:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. So, more on the 8chan section. If there are other suggestions you can make to improve the article, that would be great. I'm not worried about the AFD any more, but, well, improvement is always good. --GRuban (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Honestly? At this point I'd personally keep it as short and straight as possible and wait it out awhile. By BLP standards and the "equivalent" internet sites like 4chan that have been around for so long for a near-infinite amount of media coverage to occur? This is brand new comparatively. The article doesn't necessary need to be trimmed but further growth would just welcome edit warring, RS bickering and the NPOV stuff that's mostly stayed away to this point.
- I apologize for this being a sort of non-answer answer, but it's my style. I by and large AGF that people who edit the actual content know what they're doing and we have talk pages for this stuff. So, again, I'd just have to recommend that it not grow much for now. ♪ Tstorm(talk) 06:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- "The article you wrote sucks. Don't change a thing."? --GRuban (talk) 15:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't recall saying it sucks and I'm sorry if that's the impression I was giving. I just have some gripes on a personal style level. That's all. What "quality" means varies heavily from person-to-person. Since I don't believe in any form of ownership I'm not going to claim I know better than anyone else on any other article. I can just give advice based on things I've seen in the past. I'm sorry I couldn't be of much help to you. ♪ Tstorm(talk) 03:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- "The article you wrote sucks. Don't change a thing."? --GRuban (talk) 15:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. So, more on the 8chan section. If there are other suggestions you can make to improve the article, that would be great. I'm not worried about the AFD any more, but, well, improvement is always good. --GRuban (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Reference errors on 13 June
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tstormcandy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Bill Lichtenstein New York Times OpEd section perptuates trauma on his daughter Rose
[edit]Both are mentioned in the page he edits. WP:AVOIDVICTIM WP:COI I would like the whole nyt op ed taken down but then his "awards" for riding the trauma to fame and noteworthiness would be removed. So admin will have to decide. I am protecting Rose's privacy. I am her aunt and I love her. She has worked very hard to overcome the trauma. It does not belong in a Wikipedia page. She is a young, courageous woman. The inclusion of Rose in the OpEd was a huge mistake, to begin with. This Wikipedia page simply perpetuates Bill Lichtenstein's poor judgement once again. Once again, an external source must be called upon to rein him in. 118.111.53.123 (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)