Jump to content

User talk:Angeloparra: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
| colspan=2 | <center><small>Templates that can be used between <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags to format references</small><p>{{tl|Citation}} • {{tl|Cite web}} • {{tl|Cite book}} • {{tl|Cite news}} • {{tl|Cite journal}} • [[:Category:Citation templates|Others]] • [[Wikipedia:Citation templates|Examples]]</center>
| colspan=2 | <center><small>Templates that can be used between <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags to format references</small><p>{{tl|Citation}} • {{tl|Cite web}} • {{tl|Cite book}} • {{tl|Cite news}} • {{tl|Cite journal}} • [[:Category:Citation templates|Others]] • [[Wikipedia:Citation templates|Examples]]</center>
|-
|-
|}{{z3}}<!-- Template:Refref -->
|}<!-- Template:Refref -->
{{hidden end}}
{{hidden end}}

== July 2011 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello Angeloparra. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things [[Special:Contributions/Angeloparra|you have written about]] on Wikipedia, you may have a [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

#'''Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating''' articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
#'''Be cautious about deletion discussions'''. Everyone is welcome to provide information about [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent sources]] in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|deletion discussions]], but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
#'''Avoid linking''' to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see [[Wikipedia:Spam]]).
#'''Exercise great caution''' so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability of information]], and [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|autobiographies]].

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|our frequently asked questions for organizations]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-coi --> [[User:I Jethrobot|<b style="color:green; font-family:Corbel;">I, Jethrobot</b>]][[User talk:I Jethrobot| <sup>drop me a line</sup>]] <small>(note: not a [[WP:BOT|bot]]!)</small> 21:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

==A request==
Alright, so I'm not a robot, nor am I a template-wielder. I'm just a lowly administrator, dropping by to add my voice to the above message. If you are Mr. Perra, please refrain from editing your own article - due to our [[WP:COI|conflict-of-interest]] policy, such behaviour is not encouraged. Also, please read over our [[WP:EL|external linking]] policy - I've noticed that you've added links to your website to a few articles where said links don't quite belong. Please check those out and feel free to ask any questions! Cheers, [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">m.o.p</span>]] 21:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to [[:For Dummies]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cite references or sources]] or discuss the changes on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> <span style="background-color:lightblue">'''''&nbsp;[[User:Velella|Velella]]&nbsp;'''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue">&nbsp;<sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup>&nbsp;</span> 22:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:25, 21 February 2022

Hello, Angeloparra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BelovedFreak 08:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bessie Smith do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BelovedFreak 08:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A short referencing tutorial

[edit]

A copy of the tutorial I gave at the help desk is below (click 'show'). Feel free to ask any questions if it's still confusing. You can experiment in your user page. I've pasted the example from the tutorial to there. Edit that page and see how it is done.-- Obsidin Soul 00:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Visual inline citation guide
Formatting references using inline citations
All information in Wikipedia articles should be verified by citations to reliable sources. Our preferred method of citation is using the "cite.php" form of inline citations, using the <ref></ref> elements. Using this method, each time a particular source is mined for information (don't copy word-for-word!), a footnote is placed in the text ("inline"), that takes one to the detail of the source when clicked, set forth in a references section after the text of the article.

In brief, anywhere you want a footnote to appear in a piece of text, you place an opening <ref> tag followed by the text of the citation which you want to appear at the bottom of the article, and close with a </ref> tag. Note the closing slash ("/"). For multiple use of a single reference, the opening ref tag is given a name, like so: <ref name="name"> followed by the citation text and a closing </ref> tag. Each time you want to use that footnote again, you simply use the first element with a slash, like so: <ref name="name" />.

In order for these references to appear, you must tell the software where to display them, using either the code </references> or, most commonly, the template, {{Reflist}} which can be modified to display the references in 2 or 3 columns using {{Reflist|2}} or {{Reflist|3}}. Per our style guidelines, the references should be displayed in a separate section denominated "References" located after the body of the article.

Inline citation code; what you type in 'edit mode'
What it produces when you save
Two separate citations.<ref>Citation text.</ref><ref>Citation text2.</ref>


Multiple<ref name="multiple">Citation text3.</ref>citation<ref name="multiple" /> use.<ref name="multiple" />


==References==

{{Reflist}}

Two separate citations.[1][2]



Multiple[3] citation[3] use.[3]




References_________________

  1. ^ Citation text.
  2. ^ Citation text2.
  3. ^ a b c Citation text3.
Templates that can be used between <ref></ref> tags to format references

{{Citation}}{{Cite web}}{{Cite book}}{{Cite news}}{{Cite journal}}OthersExamples

July 2011

[edit]

Hello Angeloparra. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  1. Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  2. Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  3. Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  4. Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A request

[edit]

Alright, so I'm not a robot, nor am I a template-wielder. I'm just a lowly administrator, dropping by to add my voice to the above message. If you are Mr. Perra, please refrain from editing your own article - due to our conflict-of-interest policy, such behaviour is not encouraged. Also, please read over our external linking policy - I've noticed that you've added links to your website to a few articles where said links don't quite belong. Please check those out and feel free to ask any questions! Cheers, m.o.p 21:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to For Dummies. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   22:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]