Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 20: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:12, 26 February 2022

< March 19	March 21 >

March 20

Template:Nryf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nryf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Created in 3 edits over 3 minutes edits on 10 September 2016‎ by User:AppleRED, then nothing. Purpose is unclear. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Global Force Wrestling employees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Global Force Wrestling employees (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Global Force Wrestling personnel. Same reasons, GFW hasn't a regular roster. It's impossible to create an article or template about it. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Support per nom. APM (talk) 02:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I had deja vu when I saw this navbox and thought we already deleted it! Probably confused it with the roster article that we deleted earlier on. Either way it should be deleted with the same rationale.LM2000 (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Straight Edge Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete {{Straight Edge Society}}, the rest have been relisted since they were never tagged. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Straight Edge Society (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Also proposing Template:Vince's Devils (suggestion made by APM) Template:The Ascension Template:The Brood Template:The Corre Template:The American Wolves Template:The Fabulous Kangaroos for the same reason

Small wrestling stable. Just 4 members, I don't think the SES needs a template for just 4 members. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Support per nom. Would also suggest a deletion of Template:Vince's Devils for similar reasons. APM (talk) 02:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice. I'm watching the category and I found some similar templates. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Routemap-Infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Routemap-Infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox UK railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Routemap-Infobox with Template:Infobox UK railway.
Two templates serving basically the same purpose. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the UK template (or both) should be merged into {{Infobox rail line}}? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pigsonthewing: Sounds like a good idea, although it would require a bot run to add |subbox=yes or something. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 04:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge, oppose a further combination with {{Infobox rail line}}. Mackensen (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Useddenim (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. We can consider other templates later. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox name module

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 28 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox name module (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Chinese (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Hindu temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 28 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Hindu temple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox religious building (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
-The result of the discussion was '''Delete'''; deleted as [[WP:CSD#G2|G2]] by {{admin|Alexf}} [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 13:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)<!-- Tfd top -->
+The result of the discussion was '''Delete'''; deleted as [[WP:CSD#G2|G2]] by {{admin|Alexf}} [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<span style="color:#888800;">⚡</span>]] 13:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)<!-- Tfd top -->
 * {{Tfd links|Nryf}}
 Unused.  Created in 3 edits over 3 minutes edits on 10 September 2016‎ by [[User:AppleRED]], then nothing. Purpose is unclear. [[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#663200;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 20:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ==== [[Template:Global Force Wrestling employees]] ====
+<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
+The result of the discussion was '''Delete.'''<!-- Tfd top --> [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 22:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * {{Tfd links|Global Force Wrestling employees}}
 [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Global Force Wrestling personnel]]. Same reasons, GFW hasn't a regular roster. It's impossible to create an article or template about it. [[User:HHH Pedrigree|HHH Pedrigree]] ([[User talk:HHH Pedrigree|talk]]) 12:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': Support per nom. [[User:AmorPatiturMoras|APM]] ([[User talk:AmorPatiturMoras|talk]]) 02:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' I had deja vu when I saw this navbox and thought we already deleted it! Probably confused it with the roster article that we deleted earlier on. Either way it should be deleted with the same rationale.[[User:LM2000|LM2000]] ([[User talk:LM2000|talk]]) 22:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>
 ==== [[Template:Straight Edge Society]] ====
+<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
+The result of the discussion was '''Delete''' {{tl|Straight Edge Society}}, the rest have been relisted since they were never tagged.<!-- Tfd top --> [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 22:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * {{Tfd links|Straight Edge Society}}
+**Also proposing [[Template:Vince's Devils]] (suggestion made by APM) [[Template:The Ascension]] [[Template:The Brood]] [[Template:The Corre]] [[Template:The American Wolves]] [[Template:The Fabulous Kangaroos]] for the same reason
 Small wrestling stable. Just 4 members, I don't think the SES needs a template for just 4 members. [[User:HHH Pedrigree|HHH Pedrigree]] ([[User talk:HHH Pedrigree|talk]]) 12:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': Support per nom. Would also suggest a deletion of [[Template:Vince's Devils]] for similar reasons. [[User:AmorPatiturMoras|APM]] ([[User talk:AmorPatiturMoras|talk]]) 02:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
+**Nice. I'm watching the category and I found some similar templates. --[[User:HHH Pedrigree|HHH Pedrigree]] ([[User talk:HHH Pedrigree|talk]]) 10:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>
 ==== [[Template:Routemap-Infobox]] ====
+<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
+The result of the discussion was '''merge'''<!-- Tfd top --> [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 23:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * {{Tfd links|Routemap-Infobox|type=merge}}
 * {{Tfd links|Infobox UK railway|type=merge}}
@@ Line 43: / Line 64: @@
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 02:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Merge'''. [[User:Useddenim|Useddenim]] ([[User talk:Useddenim|talk]]) 11:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
+*'''Merge.''' We can consider other templates later. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 18:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>
 ==== [[Template:Infobox name module]] ====
+<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
+The result of the discussion was '''Relisted'''<!-- Tfd top --> on [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 28#Template:Infobox_name_module|2017 March 28]] [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 23:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * {{Tfd links|Infobox name module|type=merge}}
 * {{Tfd links|Infobox Chinese|type=merge}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>
-'''Propose merging''' [[Template:Infobox name module]] with [[Template:Infobox Chinese]].<br />
-Two translation/transliteration templates which have similar purposes, except {{tl|Infobox Chinese}} has a lot more options and is often used as a standalone infobox instead of as an infobox module. [[User:Jc86035|Jc86035]] ([[User talk:Jc86035|talk]]) <small><span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left">Use &#123;&#123;[[Template:Reply to|re]]&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;<br />to reply to me</span></small> 02:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
-*'''Comment''' What exactly would the merge entail? Would the merged template retain the functionality and behavior of the individual templates or would it result in a huge headache on thousands of articles (both are heavily utilised templates with over 10,000 transclusions between them)? It's important to note they transclude in very different ways: Infobox Chinese is an entire infobox while Infobox name module just adds some sub-fields to an existing infobox. And while it's true that Infobox name module has fewer options than Infobox Chinese, its stripped down format makes Infobox name module a bit more general purpose i.e. an editor can use it to add ''any'' language field to an infobox. In principle though I am not against the merge. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 15:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
-** {{re|Betty Logan}} {{tl|Infobox Chinese}} is composed of several subtemplates (e.g. {{tl|Infobox Chinese/Korean}}, {{tl|Infobox Chinese/Blank}}) which function pretty much like {{tl|Infobox name module}}; the only thing required for a merge would be to add a way to disable the headers. [[User:Jc86035|Jc86035]] ([[User talk:Jc86035|talk]]) <small><span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left">Use &#123;&#123;[[Template:Reply to|re]]&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;<br />to reply to me</span></small> 02:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-*'''Comment''' I think we need some clarification: is the proposal that we merge Infobox Chinese '''''into''''' Infobox name module so that {{tl|Infobox name module}} would become the all-inclusive template? Infobox name module is used with Indic scripts, not just Chinese, so my concern is that we are promoting wide, not narrow usage. Thanks. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 03:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-** {{re|Cyphoidbomb}} I think it would be best to use "Infobox name module" as the resulting template name, although the features of Infobox name module would be merged into {{tl|Infobox Chinese}} and its subpages. [[User:Jc86035|Jc86035]] ([[User talk:Jc86035|talk]]) <small><span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left">Use &#123;&#123;[[Template:Reply to|re]]&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;<br />to reply to me</span></small> 04:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-*'''Comment''' I am leaning towards merging it into that template box. Personally I do not see much value in a infobox just to translate things into multiple chinese names (usually on Chinese foods, places, or events), when you can also use the chinese wikipedia. Also if you check other languages you would not see a Spanish/Portuguese template, a Thai template, or an Indian template. One of the issues with merging that chinese template is the dialects each have their own pronunciation which can make the template very large very fast. I am in favor of keeping everything somewhat consistent for displaying foreign languages for the reader. --[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california|talk]]) 23:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-** {{re|Cs california}} I think they're useful for understanding how to pronounce the characters (zhwiki actually doesn't have transliteration data). In languages using alphabets it's obviously a lot easier to figure out the pronunciation from the spelling. [[User:Jc86035|Jc86035]] ([[User talk:Jc86035|talk]]) <small><span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left">Use &#123;&#123;[[Template:Reply to|re]]&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;<br />to reply to me</span></small> 04:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 ==== [[Template:Infobox Hindu temple]] ====
+<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
+The result of the discussion was '''Relisted'''<!-- Tfd top --> on [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 28#Template:Infobox_Hindu_temple|2017 March 28]] [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 23:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * {{Tfd links|Infobox Hindu temple|type=merge}}
 * {{Tfd links|Infobox religious building|type=merge}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>
-Infobox Hindu temple should be merged into Infobox religious building as it takes in similar fields to other religious buildings that are redundant. Template box can also be automatically recolored for differences. --[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california|talk]]) 07:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
-* '''Strong support''' per {{u|Cs california}} -- Pankaj Jain ''[[User:Capankajsmilyo|Capankajsmilyo]] <span class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Capankajsmilyo|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/Capankajsmilyo|contribs]] '''·''' [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])</span>'' 07:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
-* '''Question''': the Hindu temple template has customized forms on language etc, which seems helpful. {{ping|Frietjes}} can we create another wrapper? While we are working on this, perhaps time to add additional entries such as Stupa height, Gopuram height, Shikhara height, etc just like we have for Spire, Minaret etc in the current religious building template. [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] ([[User talk:Ms Sarah Welch|talk]]) 01:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-:I personally don't think the language things are too useful because there is a side bar for wikipedia in other language. But to keep it I would just put it in fields native_name_lang and native_name. --[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california|talk]]) 22:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-*'''Oppose''': The Infobox religious building is a template tailored to Christian and Muslim religious buildings. It lacks fields for Buddhist, Hindu etc. temples. The proposer has neither made a detailed comparison of which field matches which, nor stated what is wrong with having a dedicated Hindu temple template. I don't see the "taking in similar fields" (e.g. mandapa, gopuram(s), etc related). If the main religious building template were expanded with tailored entries for other religions just like it does for Christian with Dome, Islam with Minaret etc, or a wrapper proposed, I would reconsider my vote. [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] ([[User talk:Ms Sarah Welch|talk]]) 21:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-:If you want to know all the matching fields it is all the images, captions and name data; the pushpin maps and coordinate data, country and local data, establishment data.  But if you check the documentation Buddhism is already combined into [[Template:Infobox religious building]]. The only one that is not added is the Mormon temple one which is loading data from a table (I think).  I nominated it because most of these templates were already condense and it seems out of place to exclude some of them.
-If we decide to merge it there are two options for adding the fields that are not there
-# add an smaller module for the subfields like [[Template:Infobox pepper]] within [[Template:Infobox cultivar]] on pages like [['Fresno Chili' pepper]].
-# Add more fields.
---[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california|talk]]) 22:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)