Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitabu: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''. ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) - [[User:The Herald|'''The Herald''']] ([[User talk:The Herald|''here I am'']]) 13:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Kitabu]]=== |
===[[Kitabu]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
:{{la|Kitabu}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitabu|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January |
:{{la|Kitabu}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitabu|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 20#{{anchorencode:Kitabu}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kitabu Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Kitabu}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Kitabu}}) |
||
Shady-looking software with no sources at all. Fails [[WP:NSOFTWARE]]. [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 13:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
Shady-looking software with no sources at all. Fails [[WP:NSOFTWARE]]. [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 13:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
What do you mean by that? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Epubtools|Epubtools]] ([[User talk:Epubtools|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Epubtools|contribs]]) 14:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
What do you mean by that? |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Keep'''. There are 13 sources in the article, in a list labelled "References". From before the AFD, from before the earlier PROD. For example [http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/7-ebook-readers-mac-compared/ this ebook readers comparison] is one, with some material on Kitabu as one legitimate alternative to consider. "Shady-looking"??? is not a valid deletion reason. --[[User:doncram|<span style="color:maroon;">do</span>]][[User talk:Doncram|<span style="color:green;">ncr</span>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<span style="color:maroon;">am</span>]] 02:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
** Sorry, I don't consider "makeuseof.com" a reliable source, nor any of the other websites listed. [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 11:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Its also listed as a suggested reader in Darthmouth College [http://researchguides.dartmouth.edu/c.php?g=59713&p=382810] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Epubtools|Epubtools]] ([[User talk:Epubtools|talk]] • <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 22:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|96%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User talk:Becky Sayles|'''<span style="color:#0092d6; background:#bae9ff"><sup> B </sup><small>E </small><sub>C </sub><small>K </small><sup>Y </sup> <sub>S </sub><small>A </small><sup>Y L </sup><small>E </small><sub>S </sub></span>''']] 04:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div> |
|||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|96%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Sam Sailor|Sam]] [[User talk:Sam Sailor|<sup>''Sing!''</sup>]] <small>(please [[WP:PING]] when replying)</small> 13:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div> |
|||
*'''Keep''' and hack out the original research. Software has enough RS ([http://dottech.org/126365/mac-os-x-review-kitabu-epub-reader-app/ here's one]) establishing notability.[[User:Раціональне анархіст|<b style="font-family:georgia; font-size:11pt; color:#BFA3A3"> Pax</b>]] 07:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:40, 27 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - The Herald (here I am) 13:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Kitabu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Shady-looking software with no sources at all. Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. Shii (tock) 13:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
What do you mean by that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epubtools (talk • contribs) 14:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. There are 13 sources in the article, in a list labelled "References". From before the AFD, from before the earlier PROD. For example this ebook readers comparison is one, with some material on Kitabu as one legitimate alternative to consider. "Shady-looking"??? is not a valid deletion reason. --doncram 02:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't consider "makeuseof.com" a reliable source, nor any of the other websites listed. Shii (tock) 11:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Its also listed as a suggested reader in Darthmouth College [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epubtools (talk • — Preceding undated comment added 22:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 04:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 04:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sing! (please WP:PING when replying) 13:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sing! (please WP:PING when replying) 13:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep and hack out the original research. Software has enough RS (here's one) establishing notability. Pax 07:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.