Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubbies, Severn Beach: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:19, 2 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tubbies, Severn Beach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable, seems to be a burger bar with a children's play area outside, not an amusement park. And totally uncited. Rapido (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Never heard of it, never seen it mentioned in the local paper. Totally unnotable. Martin451 (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this play area. Joe Chill (talk) 20:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Close to zero coverage. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:RS. Warrah (talk) 04:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of notability. MilborneOne (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would argue that although this particular site is not notable, it has its place in social history. I can see no harm having an article that provides an example of British seaside tourism at the turn of the century. Agreed, the article needs a bit of work with citations etc. This specific site may be one of many in the country, none are likely to be notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. However, if they are not allowed an article, then they will be lost forever. SpikeTheSpider (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're worried about things being "lost forever", have a look at WP:ALTOUT for other wikis that accept articles like this. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 non-notable, seems to be a burger bar with a children's play area outside, not an amusement park. And totally uncited. [[User:Rapido|Rapido]] ([[User talk:Rapido|talk]]) 17:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Delete''' Never heard of it, never seen it mentioned in the local paper. Totally unnotable. [[w:User:Martin451|Martin'''<font style="color:#FB0">4</font><font style="color:#F00">5</font><font style="color:#F60">1</font>''']] ([[w:User talk:Martin451#top|talk]]) 20:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Never heard of it, never seen it mentioned in the local paper. Totally unnotable. [[w:User:Martin451|Martin'''<span style="color:#FFBB00;">4</span><span style="color:#FF0000;">5</span><span style="color:#FF6600;">1</span>''']] ([[w:User talk:Martin451#top|talk]]) 20:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''': I can't find [[WP:N|significant coverage]] for this play area. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 20:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. Close to zero coverage. [[User:Chris Neville-Smith|Chris Neville-Smith]] ([[User talk:Chris Neville-Smith|talk]]) 11:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Keep''' I would argue that although this particular site is not notable, it has its place in social history. I can see no harm having an article that provides an example of British seaside tourism at the turn of the century. Agreed, the article needs a bit of work with citations etc. This specific site may be one of many in the country,  none are likely to be notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. However, if they are not allowed an article, then they will be lost forever. [[User:SpikeTheSpider|SpikeTheSpider]] ([[User talk:SpikeTheSpider|talk]]) 00:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 :* If you're worried about things being "lost forever", have a look at [[WP:ALTOUT]] for other wikis that accept articles like this. [[User:Chris Neville-Smith|Chris Neville-Smith]] ([[User talk:Chris Neville-Smith|talk]]) 10:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>