Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangina (2): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Angusmclellan (talk | contribs)
[[Mangina]]: AfD as censorship: sure is
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Delete''' for lack of reliable sources either in the article or in this discussion. Absent verification I won't redirect but that's an editorial decision. In case this article should be recreated again, I suggest looking up sources first. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 09:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

===[[Mangina]]===
===[[Mangina]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
:{{la-admin|Mangina}}
:{{la-admin|Mangina}}
I don't know what state this article was in at the time of its [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangina|first AfD]], but it appears to have had a rather traumatic image on it <sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FMangina&diff=41336186&oldid=41329910], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mangina&diff=next&oldid=41343485]</sup>. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. I recommend that users coming to give their opinions here should look at the article's log, and also that if the article is deleted, it should be protected to prevent recreation. '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 08:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't know what state this article was in at the time of its [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangina|first AfD]], but it appears to have had a rather traumatic image on it <sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FMangina&diff=41336186&oldid=41329910], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mangina&diff=next&oldid=41343485]</sup>. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. I recommend that users coming to give their opinions here should look at the article's log, and also that if the article is deleted, it should be protected to prevent recreation. '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 08:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 17:
**Heh, I think not :p '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
**Heh, I think not :p '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
***Well, it passes the ''is this a factual article based on things the average Joe on the street knows already?'' smell test. '''In principle''' almost any dictionary entry can be expanded to create an encyclopaedic article. [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 18:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
***Well, it passes the ''is this a factual article based on things the average Joe on the street knows already?'' smell test. '''In principle''' almost any dictionary entry can be expanded to create an encyclopaedic article. [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 18:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete, redirect''' to Deuce. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 17:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete, redirect''' to Deuce. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><span style="color:#DD0000;">&gt;<span style="color:#FF6600;">R<span style="color:#FF9900;">a<span style="color:#FFCC00;">d<span style="color:#FFEE00;">i</span>a</span>n</span>t</span>&lt;</span></b>]] 17:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Appropriate for a ( slang ) dictionary, but not an encyclopedia. Let's be aware of the difference, people ! [[User:WMMartin|WMMartin]] 18:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Appropriate for a ( slang ) dictionary, but not an encyclopedia. Let's be aware of the difference, people ! [[User:WMMartin|WMMartin]] 18:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Delete''' As per nomination. [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]]
*'''Speedy Delete''' As per nomination. [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]]
Line 16: Line 23:
*'''Stong keep''' I can't see what the fuss is about. It clearly needs references but as far as I can see most people seem just to want to censor the article which is against Wikipedia policy. I couldn't find any warnings about tidying up, do the normal thing, tell the user to wikify it and OK if it can't be brought up to a an encyclopedic standard then put it up for AfD --[[User:Haseler|Mike]] 23:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Stong keep''' I can't see what the fuss is about. It clearly needs references but as far as I can see most people seem just to want to censor the article which is against Wikipedia policy. I couldn't find any warnings about tidying up, do the normal thing, tell the user to wikify it and OK if it can't be brought up to a an encyclopedic standard then put it up for AfD --[[User:Haseler|Mike]] 23:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
**Welcome to AfD [[User:Haseler|{{{2|Haseler}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Haseler|talk]]{{·}}&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Haseler|contribs]]). Yes, censoring with extreme prejudice articles whose existence is contraindicated by content policies and guidelines is a good summary of what we do here. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 19:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
**Welcome to AfD [[User:Haseler|{{{2|Haseler}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Haseler|talk]]{{·}}&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Haseler|contribs]]). Yes, censoring with extreme prejudice articles whose existence is contraindicated by content policies and guidelines is a good summary of what we do here. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 19:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
***Wha... Angus, rephrase in simple English for the science student, please! :) Contraindication = a factor that increases the risk involved in engaging in a certain activity. I'm not sure what context you're using the word in here... Care to get back to me on that one? <small>if that came across as rude, I apologise... I'm genuinely confused.</small> <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 04:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
* '''Strong Delete''' - wikipedia is not a dictionary, least of all for smut from adolescent comedy movies. [[User:Pete Fenelon|Pete Fenelon]] 01:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
* '''Weak keep''' - Mangina is a derogative term for toadying men. It is ''extremely'' common within the [[antifeminist]] movement. --[[User:David Hain|David Hain]] 13:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
** which makes it sound like it wants to be ''Transwiki''ed to wiktionary, if it's a current definition. [[WP:NOT]] [[User:Pete Fenelon|Pete Fenelon]] 13:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' if a redirect is created it should be protected to prevent recreation. [[User:Eluchil404|Eluchil404]] 07:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 10:56, 5 March 2022