Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tundenny: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:57, 5 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tundenny

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any coverage in WP:RS for "Tundenny" or for "Sulaimon Babatunde" at all in my searches. The references provided are his social media pages, two unreliable content scrapers and two thinly-veiled press releases. There is no evidence of actual notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Internet, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree there's a lack of notability here. I poked around, couldn't find much beyond what's in the releases; social media channels are also not very well followed in the grand scheme of things. Needs a lot more to be notable. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - A7, no credible claim of notability.-KH-1 (talk) 08:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable individual, fails WP:GNG. Social-Informers (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails all of Wikipedai′s notability guidelines. ZanciD (talk) 10:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could not find any independent reliable sources either. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, cannot find any SIGCOV about subject. Elbatli (talk) 19:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per comment of KH-1. Ginbopewz (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I cannot find coverage of this individual outside of WP:SPS. There is no indication that he passes WP:NBASIC or WP:NARTIST. This might well be a WP:G11, but we're already this far along in an AfD... — Mhawk10 (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Tundenny]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 23:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
+===[[:Tundenny]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|1=Tundenny}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tundenny|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 26#{{anchorencode:Tundenny}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1074193270/cur|edits since nomination]])
@@ Line 14: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Delete''' Could not find any independent reliable sources either. --[[User:Crystallizedcarbon|Crystallizedcarbon]] ([[User talk:Crystallizedcarbon|talk]]) 17:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Per nom, cannot find any SIGCOV about subject. [[User:Elbatli|Elbatli]] ([[User talk:Elbatli|talk]]) 19:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy delete''' per comment of KH-1. [[User:Ginbopewz|Ginbopewz]] ([[User talk:Ginbopewz|talk]]) 11:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. I cannot find coverage of this individual outside of [[WP:SPS]]. There is no indication that he passes [[WP:NBASIC]] or [[WP:NARTIST]]. This might well be a [[WP:G11]], but we're already this far along in an AfD... — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 06:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>