Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American Outlaws: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:20, 17 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 09:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The American Outlaws

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just declined an A7 speedy on this article about an unnofficial supporter's group for the US soccer team however I am really not convinced that it meets WP:ORG so am bringing it here for the community to decide. The cites in the article are either primary or from blogs & I have struggled to find any WP:RS to back them up. To place the club in context it appears that there are several supporters clubs for the team, the most prominent being Sam's Army & even that is of questionable note. Nancy ^talk 13:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There have been some other references added, one of which is from ESPN.com. I feel that this article should definitely not be deleted. There have been mentions of American Outlaws in many credible 3rd party sources and even during live tv broadcasts of soccer games (not sure how I would go about citing that). Franharrington (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another link from a 3rd party page referencing The American Outlaws Goal.com. Franharrington (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The addition of RS make it valid. Keep. • Freechild'sup? 13:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The layout of the page and the sourcing has been improved. Is this page still a candidate for deletion? Garrett3000 (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see any good reason for this to still be a candidate for deletion. Franharrington (talk) 18:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 21:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Started local but have expanded [1] Mentioned here, here (although subscription needed) and even in a British newspaper here Polargeo (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 09:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[The American Outlaws]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|The American Outlaws}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American Outlaws|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 December 13#{{anchorencode:The American Outlaws}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 10: / Line 16: @@
 :Here is another link from a 3rd party page referencing The American Outlaws [http://www.goal.com/en-us/news/66/united-states/2009/10/15/1562056/winners-and-losers-usa-versus-costa-rica Goal.com]. [[User:Franharrington|Franharrington]] ([[User talk:Franharrington|talk]]) 18:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
-:The addition of [[WP:RS|RS]] make it valid. '''Keep'''. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#C00000">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small>[[User talk:Freechild |'sup?]]''</small></font></span> 13:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
+:The addition of [[WP:RS|RS]] make it valid. '''Keep'''. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User :Freechild|<span style="color:#C00000;">Freechild</span>]]''<small>[[User talk:Freechild |<span style="color:#C00000;">'sup?</span>]]</small>''</span> 13:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 <hr style="width:50%;" />
-:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 00:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American Outlaws|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}
+:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 00:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)</small>
 <hr style="width:50%;" />
-:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 19:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|Articles for deletion|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}
+:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 19:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 The layout of the page and the sourcing has been improved. Is this page still a candidate for deletion? [[User:Garrett3000|Garrett3000]] ([[User talk:Garrett3000|talk]]) 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
@@ Line 21: / Line 27: @@
 I don't really see any good reason for this to still be a candidate for deletion. [[User:Franharrington|Franharrington]] ([[User talk:Franharrington|talk]]) 18:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 <hr style="width:50%;" />
-:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 21:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|Articles for deletion|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}
+:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:NuclearWarfare|<b style="color:navy;">NW</b>]] ''([[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk</span>]])'' 21:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
+*'''Keep''' Started local but have expanded [http://journalstar.com/sports/article_c17e26e8-6339-5e6a-af9a-a8e61f2c6d64.html] Mentioned [http://goal.com/en-us/news/1679/us-national-team/2009/10/13/1559684/us-world-cup-qualifying-the-scene-on-the-streets-in-dc here], [http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=GVRB&p_theme=gvrb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=12152557C87972E8&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM here (although subscription needed)] and even in a British newspaper [http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/dec/06/world-cup-ticket-buying-nations here] [[User:Polargeo|Polargeo]] ([[User talk:Polargeo|talk]]) 07:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>