Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 March 18: Difference between revisions
→Timeline of Twitter: closing: G11 speedy deletions overturned. The articles can be nominated at AfD by anyone inclined to do so. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
||
⚫ | |||
====[[:Timeline of Twitter]] (closed)==== |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;" | |
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;" | |
||
* '''[[:Timeline of Twitter]]''' – '''G11 speedy deletions overturned.''' The articles can be nominated at AfD by anyone inclined to do so. I am only restoring the articles mentioned in the review request because only they were the subject of substantial discussion here. – <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|< |
* '''[[:Timeline of Twitter]]''' – '''G11 speedy deletions overturned.''' The articles can be nominated at AfD by anyone inclined to do so. I am only restoring the articles mentioned in the review request because only they were the subject of substantial discussion here. – <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 13:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC) <!--*--> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
*'''Send to AFD'''. Not obviously advertising or promotional. And list them all separately because I can see the Twitter one being more notable than, say, Pinterest. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 11:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Send to AFD'''. Not obviously advertising or promotional. And list them all separately because I can see the Twitter one being more notable than, say, Pinterest. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 11:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
*Related AfD: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Amazon.com]]. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
*Related AfD: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Amazon.com]]. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Restore''' the articles and initiate '''AfD''' discussions if desired to obtain a broader community consensus. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|< |
*'''Restore''' the articles and initiate '''AfD''' discussions if desired to obtain a broader community consensus. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 07:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Restore''' and make it absolutely clear that G11 does not care about the ''purpose'' of or ''payment'' for promotional articles, and that it is NOT to be used as a weapon to fight paid editing battles. In a nutshell G11 is not G5, which is the ONLY CSD criterion which functions based on the status of the editor who created the article. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 06:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Restore''' and make it absolutely clear that G11 does not care about the ''purpose'' of or ''payment'' for promotional articles, and that it is NOT to be used as a weapon to fight paid editing battles. In a nutshell G11 is not G5, which is the ONLY CSD criterion which functions based on the status of the editor who created the article. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 06:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::It's not a ''reason'' by itself for speedy, but it can assist as an indication for identifying promotional articles--as over 90% of such articles are in fact promotional in content. . I ageee if it is not clearly G11 without it, it needs AfD. I would also favor introducing such a speedy criterion, except for that 10% or so of false positives, such as this one. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 17:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC) |
:::It's not a ''reason'' by itself for speedy, but it can assist as an indication for identifying promotional articles--as over 90% of such articles are in fact promotional in content. . I ageee if it is not clearly G11 without it, it needs AfD. I would also favor introducing such a speedy criterion, except for that 10% or so of false positives, such as this one. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 17:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:41, 19 March 2022
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Also see Timeline of Facebook, Timeline of Instagram, Timeline of Pinterest, Timeline of Snapchat, Timeline of LinkedIn. These are all improper applications of CSD by JzG, because CSD is meant for unambiguous cases. At least two admins Anachronist and DGG have already informed JzG that the material is not unambiguously promotion and the application of G11 was improper, but they refused to undelete and asked me to take it to DRV. CSD is not meant as a tool to bypass consensus; it would be fine to list these articles at AfD if so desired. See also the recently closed CSD here for Givewell, which was also CSD'ed by JzG. There is already a section on WP:COIN which deals with many similar articles. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 12:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |