Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celor lens: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''Keep'''. There is consensus that the article should not be deleted outright, but no consensus as to whether the page should be kept or merged. <small>([[Wikipedia:Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]])</small> [[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 17:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
===[[:Celor lens]]=== |
===[[:Celor lens]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} |
|||
:{{la|Celor lens}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celor lens|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 6#{{anchorencode:Celor lens}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Celor_lens Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Celor lens}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celor lens|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 6#{{anchorencode:Celor lens}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Celor_lens Stats]</span>) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 18: | ||
:::{{ping|TenPoundHammer}} Unless your toenails have received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, no. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC) |
:::{{ping|TenPoundHammer}} Unless your toenails have received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, no. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|< |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 03:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*Shouldn't be deleted, but merging to [[Dialyte lens]] would make sense to me. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 12:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
*Shouldn't be deleted, but merging to [[Dialyte lens]] would make sense to me. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 12:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
*: A merge would be kind of acceptable, though I'm not sure what it would accomplish. The main article might end up with a [[WP:UNDUE|disproportionate]] coverage of the Celor design - or not. It's a fairly specialised subject with most sources hidden behind paywalls, so it's hard to tell. [[User:Rentier|Rentier]] ([[User talk:Rentier|talk]]) 12:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
*: A merge would be kind of acceptable, though I'm not sure what it would accomplish. The main article might end up with a [[WP:UNDUE|disproportionate]] coverage of the Celor design - or not. It's a fairly specialised subject with most sources hidden behind paywalls, so it's hard to tell. [[User:Rentier|Rentier]] ([[User talk:Rentier|talk]]) 12:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 24: | ||
*'''Keep''' per sources found by {{u|Rentier}}. Merge can always be considered after AfD has closed. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per sources found by {{u|Rentier}}. Merge can always be considered after AfD has closed. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:J947|<span style="color:#1009bf;">J</span>]][[User talk:J947|<i style="color:#137412;">947</i>]]'''<sup><sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/J947|c]]) ([[Special:EmailUser/J947|m]])</sup></sup></sup> 05:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*'''Keep''' per sources dug up by {{u|Rentier}}. In the interest of consensus, a merge or a selective merge is a reasonable course of action, and may better serve our readers on this specialist topic in optical lens design. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 20:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 19 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. There is consensus that the article should not be deleted outright, but no consensus as to whether the page should be kept or merged. (non-admin closure) Jax 0677 (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Celor lens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced since 2006, no sourcing found, dicdef. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep appears to be a notable lens design. Dedicated book chapter [1], few sentences in another book [2], and more [3]. Lack of references is not a reason for deletion. The requirement is verifiability not verification. Rentier (talk) 11:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Rentier: That doesn't fix the article being an obscure dictionary definition that fails to assert notability. My toenails exist and can be verified; does that make them worthy of an article? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @TenPoundHammer: Unless your toenails have received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, no. ~Kvng (talk) 15:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Shouldn't be deleted, but merging to Dialyte lens would make sense to me. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- A merge would be kind of acceptable, though I'm not sure what it would accomplish. The main article might end up with a disproportionate coverage of the Celor design - or not. It's a fairly specialised subject with most sources hidden behind paywalls, so it's hard to tell. Rentier (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per sources found by Rentier. Merge can always be considered after AfD has closed. ~Kvng (talk) 15:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 05:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 05:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per sources dug up by Rentier. In the interest of consensus, a merge or a selective merge is a reasonable course of action, and may better serve our readers on this specialist topic in optical lens design. --Mark viking (talk) 20:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.