Wikipedia:Peer review/Stephen Short/archive1: Difference between revisions
→Stephen Short: Archiving as this meets Wikipedia:Peer review/Request removal policy |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Thanks, [[User:Jeffness|Jeff]] ([[User talk:Jeffness|talk]]) 04:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks, [[User:Jeffness|Jeff]] ([[User talk:Jeffness|talk]]) 04:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
I am sorry, but this meets the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Request removal policy]], specifically ''Requests that aren't appropriate for peer review, for instance requests for help in containing vandalism, resolving an edit war, or detecting a copyvio. These should be removed promptly in the interest of the requester, since he/she is unlikely to get adequate response to them at Peer Review. Please drop a note on the requester's talk page to inform them of the removal and the reasons for it, and try to recommend a better page to list the request...''. If the listing at the SPAM noticeboard does not work, please consider the conflict of interest noticeboard: [[WP:COI/N]]. Thanks and sorry, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub |
I am sorry, but this meets the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Request removal policy]], specifically ''Requests that aren't appropriate for peer review, for instance requests for help in containing vandalism, resolving an edit war, or detecting a copyvio. These should be removed promptly in the interest of the requester, since he/she is unlikely to get adequate response to them at Peer Review. Please drop a note on the requester's talk page to inform them of the removal and the reasons for it, and try to recommend a better page to list the request...''. If the listing at the SPAM noticeboard does not work, please consider the conflict of interest noticeboard: [[WP:COI/N]]. Thanks and sorry, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub style="color:green;">><></sub><small>°</small><sup><small>°</small></sup>]]''' 02:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 10:31, 23 March 2022
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I came across this page and noticed that it is written as an autobiography and seems to be very... slanted towards whoever wrote it. By looking at the [1] one can tell that User:ManbirS has some relation to this person, and his edit history is deeply suspicious of promotional activity.
That's not to say promotional activity is entirely bad; They do work that adds to the encyclopedia, but it seems to be the information being added isn't exactly unbiased.
That is why I am flagging this article for a PR.
Thanks, Jeff (talk) 04:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry, but this meets the Wikipedia:Peer review/Request removal policy, specifically Requests that aren't appropriate for peer review, for instance requests for help in containing vandalism, resolving an edit war, or detecting a copyvio. These should be removed promptly in the interest of the requester, since he/she is unlikely to get adequate response to them at Peer Review. Please drop a note on the requester's talk page to inform them of the removal and the reasons for it, and try to recommend a better page to list the request.... If the listing at the SPAM noticeboard does not work, please consider the conflict of interest noticeboard: WP:COI/N. Thanks and sorry, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)