Talk:Lint (material)/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:09, 24 March 2022

This is an archive of past discussions about Lint (material). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Lint

this article is missing coverage of animals, some of which have navel lint as well. And on the composition of the lint, which has non-clothing related components. 65.95.13.213 (talk) 04:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed merge

I propose merging navel lint into this article, as it is only a particular kind of the material. bd2412 T 19:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree. We do not have separate articles on pocket lint, toe lint, shoe lint, turn-up lint, etc.. Should the section expand we can split again. Rich Farmbrough, 20:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC).

If there are no other comments, I think this is good to go. bd2412 T 20:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

The merge is a bad idea. There is enough material in the other wikis (de, it), to expand into its own article. Navel lint is discussed in many sources as a distinct topic from lint in general.--Sum (talk) 23:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Both the German and Italian navel lint articles are basically one long paragraph. The material is already reflected in this article, except for the note, of dubious encyclopedic value, about the "world record holder" for navel lint. In short, there is nothing in those articles with which this section could be expanded. bd2412 T 23:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Lint free

Could this article explain why there are lint-free versions of q-tips and cloths — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.7.93.63 (talk) 19:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lint (material). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305213824/http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/consumer/productsafety/dryers/ to http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/consumer/productsafety/dryers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Proposed merge==
-I propose merging [[navel lint]] into this article, as it is only a particular kind of the material. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:tan">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 19:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
+I propose merging [[navel lint]] into this article, as it is only a particular kind of the material. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:tan;">'''''bd2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 19:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 :I'm inclined to agree.  We do not have separate articles on pocket lint, toe lint, shoe lint, turn-up lint, etc.. Should the section expand we can split again. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>20:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC).</small><br />
-:: If there are no other comments, I think this is good to go. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:tan">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 20:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
+:: If there are no other comments, I think this is good to go. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:tan;">'''''bd2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 20:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 The merge is a bad idea. There is enough material in the other wikis (de, it), to expand into its own article. Navel lint is discussed in many sources as a distinct topic from lint in general.--[[User:SummerWithMorons|Sum]] ([[User talk:SummerWithMorons|talk]]) 23:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
-: Both the German and Italian navel lint articles are basically one long paragraph. The material is already reflected in this article, except for the note, of dubious encyclopedic value, about the "world record holder" for navel lint. In short, there is nothing in those articles with which this section could be expanded. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:tan">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 23:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
+: Both the German and Italian navel lint articles are basically one long paragraph. The material is already reflected in this article, except for the note, of dubious encyclopedic value, about the "world record holder" for navel lint. In short, there is nothing in those articles with which this section could be expanded. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:tan;">'''''bd2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 23:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 == Lint free ==