Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/San Francisco earthquake fire: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →San Francisco Earthquake 1906; fire: clouds -> smoke, grammar |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* '''Support as nominator''' [[User:Enuja|Enuja]] [[User talk:Enuja|(talk)]] 01:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC) I support the original; the sharpened edit does not improve the image at all, as far as I can tell. It does look an itsy bit sharper on the people in the street, but some of the building ledges have artifacts, and the smoke is honestly essentially indistinguishable between the images for me, except that the edit might have some of the grain blotted out. I was flipping back and forth between images at full resolution, and in much the space of the picture, it was very difficult to see a difference. - [[User:Enuja|Enuja]] [[User talk:Enuja|(talk)]] 22:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
* '''Support as nominator''' [[User:Enuja|Enuja]] [[User talk:Enuja|(talk)]] 01:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC) I support the original; the sharpened edit does not improve the image at all, as far as I can tell. It does look an itsy bit sharper on the people in the street, but some of the building ledges have artifacts, and the smoke is honestly essentially indistinguishable between the images for me, except that the edit might have some of the grain blotted out. I was flipping back and forth between images at full resolution, and in much the space of the picture, it was very difficult to see a difference. - [[User:Enuja|Enuja]] [[User talk:Enuja|(talk)]] 22:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
* '''Support'''. My thunder has been stolen! Hoping I get conomination credit for digging this out of the Commons slush pile and editing it. |
* '''Support'''. My thunder has been stolen! Hoping I get conomination credit for digging this out of the Commons slush pile and editing it. [[User:Durova|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#009">Durova</span>]]<sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 01:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' Good pic, good resolution for its age. [[User:Clegs|Clegs]] ([[User talk:Clegs|talk]]) 04:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Good pic, good resolution for its age. [[User:Clegs|Clegs]] ([[User talk:Clegs|talk]]) 04:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Is there any chance of seeing this picture being slightly sharpened just to see if this improves it slightly?[[User:Seddon69|Seddon69]] ([[User talk:Seddon69|talk]]) 18:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' Is there any chance of seeing this picture being slightly sharpened just to see if this improves it slightly?[[User:Seddon69|Seddon69]] ([[User talk:Seddon69|talk]]) 18:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
**Good thought; that was one of the things I experimented with during cleanup. It caused some pixelation without really much benefit, although if you'd like to give it a stab and your results come out better I'd gladly support that. |
**Good thought; that was one of the things I experimented with during cleanup. It caused some pixelation without really much benefit, although if you'd like to give it a stab and your results come out better I'd gladly support that. [[User:Durova|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#009">Durova</span>]]<sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 20:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
<noinclude>[[Category:Featured picture nominations]] [[Category:Featured picture nominations/January 2008]]</noinclude> |
<noinclude>[[Category:Featured picture nominations]] [[Category:Featured picture nominations/January 2008]]</noinclude> |
||
*'''Support''' by Clegs. —[[user:aitias|αἰτίας]] ''•''[[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']]''•'' 20:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' by Clegs. —[[user:aitias|αἰτίας]] ''•''[[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']]''•'' 20:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Support''' Marvelous, historic and encyclopedic. [[User:Spikebrennan|Spikebrennan]] ([[User talk:Spikebrennan|talk]]) 15:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Marvelous, historic and encyclopedic. [[User:Spikebrennan|Spikebrennan]] ([[User talk:Spikebrennan|talk]]) 15:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I have put up a slightly sharpened image with and tried to limit the noise from this especially seen in the clouds. [[User:Seddon69|Seddon69]] ([[User talk:Seddon69|talk]]) 17:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' I have put up a slightly sharpened image with and tried to limit the noise from this especially seen in the clouds. [[User:Seddon69|Seddon69]] ([[User talk:Seddon69|talk]]) 17:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
**Thank you! I'll see what other editors think. Cheers, |
**Thank you! I'll see what other editors think. Cheers, [[User:Durova|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#009">Durova</span>]]<sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 21:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*[[Image:Crystal Clear action apply.png|15px]] '''Strong Support''' Very nice historical shot. [[User:Cat-five|Cat-five]] - [[User talk:Cat-five|talk]] 08:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
|||
*'''Support''' A historic and majestic shot of good quality. --[[User:Ubardak|Ubardak]] ([[User talk:Ubardak|talk]]) 08:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<br> |
|||
{{FPCresult|Promoted|Image:Sfearthquake3b.jpg}} --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 09:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC) [[Category:Ended featured picture nominations]] |
|||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 24 March 2022
- Reason
- User:Durova nominated it on Picture Peer Review, praising the danger of the circumstances of the picture taking. It very well illustrates the fire section of the article, and it is of high resolution.
- Articles this image appears in
- San Francisco earthquake of 1906
- Creator
- photograph taken by H.D. Chadwick, U.S. Government War Department
- Support as nominator Enuja (talk) 01:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC) I support the original; the sharpened edit does not improve the image at all, as far as I can tell. It does look an itsy bit sharper on the people in the street, but some of the building ledges have artifacts, and the smoke is honestly essentially indistinguishable between the images for me, except that the edit might have some of the grain blotted out. I was flipping back and forth between images at full resolution, and in much the space of the picture, it was very difficult to see a difference. - Enuja (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support. My thunder has been stolen! Hoping I get conomination credit for digging this out of the Commons slush pile and editing it. DurovaCharge! 01:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good pic, good resolution for its age. Clegs (talk) 04:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Is there any chance of seeing this picture being slightly sharpened just to see if this improves it slightly?Seddon69 (talk) 18:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good thought; that was one of the things I experimented with during cleanup. It caused some pixelation without really much benefit, although if you'd like to give it a stab and your results come out better I'd gladly support that. DurovaCharge! 20:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support by Clegs. —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks good, encyclopedic. --Sharkface217 05:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Marvelous, historic and encyclopedic. Spikebrennan (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I have put up a slightly sharpened image with and tried to limit the noise from this especially seen in the clouds. Seddon69 (talk) 17:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'll see what other editors think. Cheers, DurovaCharge! 21:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Strong Support Very nice historical shot. Cat-five - talk 08:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)- Support A historic and majestic shot of good quality. --Ubardak (talk) 08:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Sfearthquake3b.jpg --jjron (talk) 09:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)