Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexy Slang: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:46, 26 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 09:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sexy Slang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, no evidence of notability in independent media. Acroterion (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So adding sources of notability from independent media should prevent this article from deletion? User talk: Sampack 4:49 AM April 6 2011 (EST)

That's the general idea; please feel free to add sources and note it here. Acroterion (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources added: Bloomberg Businessweek, Fox Business, The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch, St. Petersburg Times, and Ebony Magazine. -Sampack (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

undecided does The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch [1] count as a substantial mention if so then I guess I am in the keep column otherwise delete. I couldn't really find anything beyond their own press links [2]Tetron76 (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mentioned in Bloomberg Businessweek and Fox Business. Needs improvement, but notable. Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 20:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Based on above sources, plus Ebony Magazine (passing), St. Petersburg Times (more substantial). --joe decker ^{talk to me} 22:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (If my vote counts) I believe that this article is worth noting. With the inclusion of notable sources that have been added this article should be considered reliable. -Sampack (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete I'm not sure what priority board-games like these have. It's hard to gauge their encyclopedic value in terms of a global audience. Theo10011 (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to have significant coverage in independent reliable sources Chzz ► 02:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 09:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 ===[[Sexy Slang]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
 :{{la|Sexy Slang}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexy Slang|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 April 4#{{anchorencode:Sexy Slang}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources|Sexy Slang}})
-Contested PROD, no evidence of notability in independent media. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 11:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
+Contested PROD, no evidence of notability in independent media. '''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color:black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color:gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 11:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 So adding sources of notability from independent media should prevent this article from deletion? [[User talk: Sampack]] 4:49 AM April 6 2011 (EST)
-:That's the general idea; please feel free to add sources and note it here. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 15:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
+:That's the general idea; please feel free to add sources and note it here. '''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color:black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color:gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 15:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games|list of Games-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)</small>
+:Sources added: Bloomberg Businessweek, Fox Business, The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch, St. Petersburg Times, and Ebony Magazine. -[[User:Sampack|Sampack]] ([[User talk:Sampack|talk]]) 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
+*'''undecided''' does [[The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch]] [http://www.frequency.com/video/sexy-slang-on-big-idea-with-donny/4073030] count as a substantial mention if so then I guess I am in the keep column otherwise delete. I couldn't really find anything beyond their own press links [http://sexyslang.com/asseenin.html][[User:Tetron76|Tetron76]] ([[User talk:Tetron76|talk]]) 15:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' Mentioned in Bloomberg Businessweek and Fox Business. Needs improvement, but notable. Regards,   [[User:MacMed|<b style="color:green;">MacMed</b>]][[User talk:MacMed|<sup style="color:red;">talk</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/MacMed|<sub style="color:black;">stalk</sub>]] 20:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''  Based on above sources, plus [http://books.google.com/books?id=lkkvcumYMtcC&pg=PA101&dq=%22sexy+slang%22&hl=en&ei=reWcTaL3Eoy8sQPvytT7Aw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CFcQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22sexy%20slang%22&f=false Ebony Magazine] (passing), [http://www.tampabay.com/features/books/bedroom-book-speaks-in-sexy-slang/1149121 St. Petersburg Times] (more substantial). --[[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk to me</i></small></sup>]] 22:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' (If my vote counts) I believe that this article is worth noting. With the inclusion of notable sources that have been added this article should be considered reliable.  -[[User:Sampack|Sampack]] ([[User talk:Sampack|talk]]) 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
+*'''delete''' I'm not sure what priority board-games like these have. It's hard to gauge their encyclopedic value in terms of a global audience. [[User:Theo10011|Theo10011]] ([[User talk:Theo10011|talk]]) 02:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' Appears to have significant coverage in independent reliable sources <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 02:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>