User talk:Resolution Man

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Christian Brothers' High School, Lewisham do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 02:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

TRON Music Arranger

Hi there. I reverted your earlier edit yesterday in which you had stated that Richard Bowden was the music arranger for the movie TRON. I see that you added that information again, so I wanted to let you know that I thought your information was incorrect. Here's why:

According to the IMDB entry for TRON (see "Music Department"):

• Richard Bowden: Conductor, Los Angeles Orchestra
• Jorge Calandrelli: Orchestrator
• Wendy Carlos: Music synthesizer performances and processing (she is also recognized as the main composer)
• Annemarie Franklin: Assistant to composer
• Michael Fremer: Music supervisor
• Douglas Gamley: Conductor, London Philharmonic Orchestra
• Jeffrey G. Gusman: Music layout
• John Mosely: Score recordist
• Tom Bocci: Music supervisor for songs (uncredited)

Also, I don't usually see music arrangers credited in the music portion of the movie infobox - this space is usually reserved for the main composer/performer credits as to who is most notable for the movie's music. If you feel that Richard Bowden's role as conductor of one of the orchestras was particularly notable, you're welcome to bring it up on the article talk page. If you have a reliable source that names Bowden as the person who arranged the music, that would help, but we should work toward consensus to include that (or any info about Bowden) in the article and/or its infobox.

Thanks! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 01:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

P-39 debris in Tonopah

Doesn't matter if you've seen it with your own two eyes, you will need a source that says it's true. Even then, the mention of this isn't nearly as important as you think. Binksternet (talk) 22:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Now that a number of editors have challenged the submission you have made, please follow WP:BRD and direct your comments to the appropriate P-39 Airacobra talk page. FWiW, one of the concerns that has arisen is that attribution is required, as well, you may want to look at the writing style used. Your submission: "Tonapah, Nevada was an early training base for the pilots of the P-39 and much history and artifacts can be viewed at the Central Nevada Museum in the town of Tonapah !" is not posed in an encyclopedic format. Consider this version:"A display at the Central Nevada Museum, Tonapah, Nevada is devoted to the role of the P-39 in the Tonapah training base during World War II." In that way, you have established the context and notability of the statement, although it still could be considered a very minor aspect of the P-39's history. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:34, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Absent more than wreckage at a Tonopah museum, which isn't notable in itself, it's going to continue to get reverted. And if you keep adding, you risk getting blocked, or banned, as a vandal. It seems to me you've got the right aims, just not enough to make it notable. Do you have (digital) pictures? Post 'em on the Commons. The museum might not make it here, but maybe here... TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 19:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Douglas DC-5 article

Large amounts of the text are verbatim and have to be changed, otherwise the article is in violation of copyright. Please take care to attribute sources accurately. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC).

Your addition to Douglas DC-5 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 12:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

December 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Bell P-39 Airacobra. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)