Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skvish: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 02:57, 30 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 23:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skvish

Not notable, not verifiable, likely hoax. Google finds only one page containing both Lozar and Skvish: our own article. Amazon.com doesn't have any books written by anyone named Mojca Lozar or David Glumac. —Caesura ^(t) 16:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nonsense. Endomion 17:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The authors seem to be real (Slovenian authors), but the article is not notable. --mmtux talk 18:27, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I searched and couldn't find anything about the authors, let alone the 'skvish'. My search results showed Mojca Lozar as an independent candidate in Slovenian elections and David Glumac as writing a review for Amazon! This is definitely rubbish. Lupinewulf 06:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd tend to object, since both Mojca and I are real, and I can provide you with a scan of the book(s), but if you think it's not something that should be listed, be my guests! //David

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result of the debate was '''DELETE'''. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 23:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 ===[[Skvish]]===
 Not notable, not verifiable, likely hoax. Google finds only [http://www.google.com/search?q=Lozar+Skvish one page] containing both ''Lozar'' and ''Skvish'': our own article. [[Amazon.com]] doesn't have any books written by anyone named Mojca Lozar or David Glumac. —[[User:Caesura|Caesura]][[User talk:Caesura|<sup>(t)</sup>]] 16:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
@@ Line 5: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Delete''' - I searched and couldn't find anything about the authors, let alone the 'skvish'. My search results showed Mojca Lozar as an independent candidate in Slovenian elections and David Glumac as writing a review for Amazon! This is definitely rubbish. [[User:Lupinewulf|Lupinewulf]] 06:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 I'd tend to object, since both Mojca and I are real, and I can provide you with a scan of the book(s), but if you think it's not something that should be listed, be my guests! //David
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>